Posted on 10/31/2014 8:26:20 PM PDT by marktwain
In Michigan, following the kidnap and murder of an Arkansas real estate agent, a number of women real estate agents are studying how to effectively control their guns in a deadly force situation. The person who is encouraging them is the petite, attractive, Shelley Gottschling, pictured above.
There is nothing particularly unusual about this. Firearm instructors have long noted the ability of women to become excellent shots, and the fact that women do not bring the macho baggage to the range that some men do. Shelley's mentor, however, notes that she is exceptional. From mlive.com:
"I haven't seen too many women who can handle a .45 like she can," says Ray Rocha, Gottschling's shooting mentor.What is noteworthy is that this article was published in mlive.com, a somewhat "liberal" mainstream publication. There is no obligatory disarmenter comments about how "she will have the gun taken from her and used against her" or the ever popular, and false "a gun in the home is 22 times more likely to be used against you than for self defense".
Since obtaining her concealed pistol license in May 2013, Gottschling has worked to improve her shot in an effort to feel more safe and prepared on the job. Now, in the wake of the kidnapping and slaying of an Arkansas real estate agent, she's encouraging other real estate agents to do the same.
"Personally, I like the .45 because if I'm in a situation where someone is banging on a door and I'm trapped, I have the confidence it can shoot through that door," she said.
I’m surprised it took so long to overcome the propaganda onslaught.
The necessity of packing heat will become more self-evident after the muzzie ‘lone wolves’ start their terrorist attacks in the country.
The very politicians who presently try to prevent law abiding citizens from arming themselves, have armed bodyguards because they know that they and their family members have become prime targets of ISIS.
BTTT ...WOOF !
It is not just guns. It is also advanced by a “no fighting” policy in schools. Even if you defend yourself from an attack. Happened to my now 31 YO son when he was in the 6th grade. He served exactly the same detention that the aggressor did. I reasoned with the principal that he should make a moral distinction in favor of my son, even if it only meant letting him out 15 minutes ahead of the other kid, who was a known trouble-maker and was later expelled. His face brightened, and then said, “No, I can’t do that.” I was appalled and totally lost my respect for the man.
I am convinced that this policy is pushed in order to condition children, later to be adults, to be passively compliant when the government moves to take away their freedom. They try to teach that violence is ALWAYS a bad thing.
That principle is polar opposite of their “build self esteem” effort. The contradictory principle is that a child’s self image and self worth is vitally important to them, but not important enough defend yourself from an attack, whether it be on your body or your freedom.
I taught my children that self-defense is a virtue, not a vice. Big government needs to be on notice from EVERYONE that when you come after us, we WILL fight back.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.