Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman

Ignoring the global warming scare about CO2, a new coal-fired plant, which removes all emissions harmful to health, has a lower cost per KWH of output than a new gas-fired plant. There is therefore no rationale for the proposed EPA regulations. If promulgated, they should be revoked by a future Republican administration.

A coal-fired plant’s CO2 emissions are approximately double that of a gas-fired plant. CO2 Sequestration/capture is very expensive. A modern coal plant removes the harmful gases and particulates from the flue gas: N2, H2O, O2, NOx, SOx and fly ash. CO2 sequestration/capture has no environmental value and no economic value, other than the use of CO2 for petroleum extraction.


15 posted on 10/10/2014 12:19:55 PM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kennard

Yeah, well what about the use of “See Uh O 2” for fizzin’ up pepsi and coke etc.? :>}

On a more serious note, the word rational/e is non-existent when it comes to the epa. If they can get away with “it” they will. “Congress? We don’t need no steenkin’ congress.”


16 posted on 10/10/2014 12:26:32 PM PDT by rktman ("The only thing dumber than a brood hen is a New York democrat." Mother Abagail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson