Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

All Four Teachers in New Dem Ad Claiming School Cuts are in Districts Receiving More Money
Michigan Capitol Confidential ^ | 10/8/2014 | Tom Gantert

Posted on 10/10/2014 6:24:17 AM PDT by MichCapCon

A new Mark Schauer for governor political advertisement features four teachers from four different school districts who claim that Gov. Rick Snyder has cut funding to their districts.

But in fact, on a per-student basis, all four districts actually received more taxpayer money in 2013-14 than they did in 2010-2011, which was the last budget approved by Gov. Jennifer Granholm.

The ad features seven teachers but only four specifically cite lower funding.

For months Schauer, who is the Democratic candidate for the state’s top office, has claimed that Gov. Snyder cut funding to public schools. This claim has been refuted by several sources.

Specifically, this week Detroit Free Press reporter Paul Egan fact-checked and found "truthful" a political ad by Gov. Snyder denying that his administration cut $1 billion from public education.

Egan added, “That's more than can be said for the education funding stories told in ads sponsored by Democratic candidate Mark Schauer and the Democratic Governors Association."

The teachers in the Schauer ad referred to above are employed by Lincoln Consolidated Schools, Ann Arbor Public Schools, Novi Community Schools and the Plymouth Education Center charter public school. All four claim in the ad that their schools are getting less money today under Gov. Snyder.

Yet the three conventional school districts and one charter school each received more state dollars per student in 2013-14 than in 2010-11 according to the Michigan Department of Education.

State funding for Michigan public schools is complex. It contains several different components and is also tied to student enrollment numbers.

Novi High School teacher Chandra Madafferi is one of the individuals in the Schauer ad. She recently testified at a Senate hearing on behalf of the Michigan Education Association, the state’s largest teacher union.

In the ad, Madafferi responds to a question about whether Gov. Snyder increased funding to schools. “Definitely not mine,” she answers.

That answer would be accurate if it referred to just one particular part of state funding — the “per-pupil foundation allowance” — but is false for overall state funding. Adding to the potential for confusion, the foundation allowance is actually a mixture of state and local funds.

Looking at just state dollars — not federal or local money — Novi Community Schools received $6,404 per student in 2013-14, which is about $1,000 more per student than the $5,411 it received in 2010-11. Overall, the district received $34.1 million in state dollars in 2010-11, with 6,315 students enrolled, and $41.3 million in 2013-14, with 6,443 students enrolled.

These state dollars are divided into several pots, including the state’s contribution to the foundation allowance, money for school employees’ retirement benefit costs and special education, school lunch programs and “best practices” incentive payments. The foundation allowance component did fall, from $8,799 per pupil in 2010-2011 to $8,359 per pupil in 2013-14, but in total Novi schools received substantially more dollars per student from state taxpayers in 2013-2014 than three years ago.

The tale is similar in the other three districts cited in the Schauer ad. Lincoln Consolidated Schools saw its total per-pupil funding from the state increase from $6,819 in 2010-11 to $7,727 in 2013-14. State funding to the Ann Arbor district jumped from $5,215 per student in 2010-11 to $5,626 in 2013-14. The Plymouth Education Center charter public school saw its per pupil funding from the state increase from $7,691 in 2010-11 to $7,773 in 2013-14.

Here are the most recent figures (2012-2013) for how much each school district received per student when all funding sources including federal dollars are included: $10,454 to Novi; $10,104 to Lincoln Consolidated; $11,460 to Ann Arbor; and $8,434 to the Plymouth Education Center.

Statewide, the number of state dollars spent on K-12 education has increased every year Gov. Snyder has been in office, rising from $11.01 billion in 2011-12 and $11.21 billion in 2012-13 to $11.60 billion in 2013-14, according to the Senate Fiscal Agency.


TOPICS: Education
KEYWORDS: funding; markschauer; michigan; ricksnyder; school
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 10/10/2014 6:24:17 AM PDT by MichCapCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Teacher Unions???

...Democrats = lying stacks of Ship High In Transit


2 posted on 10/10/2014 6:29:52 AM PDT by BCW (ARMIS EXPOSCERE PACEM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Fire them all.


3 posted on 10/10/2014 6:32:29 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Rope. Tree. Politician. Some assembly required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

The “more money” goes to further bloat the school administration and payoff the Union leadership, so they can funnel the money back to Democrat campaigns.

Students and meaningful education see NO BENEFIT!!!


4 posted on 10/10/2014 6:32:43 AM PDT by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

To a Rat a “cut” is giving them less of an increase than they asked for.


5 posted on 10/10/2014 6:34:06 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BCW

A few years ago they managed to recall a state senator for cutting the number of teachers in a particular district despite the fact that the district actually added 7 teachers.

Nothing but lying scum.


6 posted on 10/10/2014 6:34:37 AM PDT by cripplecreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

My entire life I have heard the lamentations of teachers and school districts being underfunded. They will NEVER be satisfied. You give them a million dollars they will cry because you didn’t give them 2.


7 posted on 10/10/2014 6:35:07 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Gee, teachers union officials and Democrat Party operatives are lying.

Who ever would have guessed?


8 posted on 10/10/2014 6:35:14 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

While I do not consider it a badge of honor that Snyder is hosing more money into the Public School trough, I do think it is important to point out when your opponents are flat out attempting to deceive voters.


9 posted on 10/10/2014 6:36:57 AM PDT by Rebel_Ace (Tags?!? Tags?!? We don' neeeed no stinkin' Tags!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

The more we fund schools, the poorer the outcome is.

Consider cutting funds, maybe that will help.


10 posted on 10/10/2014 6:37:30 AM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Yup. If they asked for a 6% increase and got a 4% increase, their budget has been cut by 2%.


11 posted on 10/10/2014 6:40:34 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

To paraphrase the old CCR song, when you ask how much money the taxpayer should pay each school district, the teachers’ union only answers “More More More!”


12 posted on 10/10/2014 6:41:52 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon
As a teacher (albeit one who's teaching at a Catholic school, after 10 years in the public schools), one of the most frustrating things about dreck like this (i.e. the sob story, decorated with lies, that "we're being deprived of money!") is that it grants the false premise that "more money = better education"... which is a load of horse hockey.

As my dad says: "When you hear a group of teachers say that they need a pay raise to do a better job, fire the lot of them... since they've just admitted to doing less than their best, in the meantime!"

I really do wonder if use of the slogan "for the kids" is an infallible indicator of someone who *doesn't care* about the kids...
13 posted on 10/10/2014 6:42:33 AM PDT by paladinan (Rule #1: There is a God. Rule #2: It isn't you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
Yup. If they asked for a 6% increase and got a 4% increase, their budget has been cut by 2%.

:) EXACTLY.
14 posted on 10/10/2014 6:43:52 AM PDT by paladinan (Rule #1: There is a God. Rule #2: It isn't you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Demonrats lie? Say it ain’t so!


15 posted on 10/10/2014 6:45:53 AM PDT by Crazieman (Article V or National Divorce. The only solutions now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

The New New Math?


16 posted on 10/10/2014 6:46:58 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

I wish we could always be factually accurate about things.

This is a prime example. If a budget increases 4%, but they had wanted 6%, they say it’s a “cut” in spending of 2%.

In the real world, that is not a cut in spending. In the real world, spending went up by 4%. Only in government spending, or among political operatives, are they allowed to lie and say that spending was cut by 2%, by some evil Republican administration.


17 posted on 10/10/2014 6:47:20 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

All Four Teachers in New Dem Ad Claiming School Cuts are in Districts Receiving More Money

Liberal union people in a Democrat ad are lying? What is this world coming too!


18 posted on 10/10/2014 6:47:40 AM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (I am an American. Not a Republican or a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ted Grant

The more we fund schools, the poorer the outcome is.

Consider cutting funds, maybe that will help.


I’ve researched and found that some of our big city school systems, which spend among the most per capita on education in this country, also have some of the poorest student achievement. Yet liberals always say we need more “resources”. Resources is a favorite word of the liberals, who don’t want to say “money” sometimes.


19 posted on 10/10/2014 6:49:01 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BCW
...and don't forget where all those hard-earned dollars will go, once the NEA gets its hands on it:

• “The National Education Association supports family planning, including the right to reproductive freedom.
• The Association urges the government to give high priority to making available all methods of family planning to women and men unable to take advantage of private facilities.
• The Association also urges the implementation of community-operated, school-based family planning clinics that will provide intensive counseling by trained personnel.”

(Reference: NEA 2014-15 Resolution I-17)

At the 1998 NEA Assembly in New Orleans, LA, a first time delegate asked the following 3-part question (from the resolution above) at the microphone:

• Through the words “reproductive freedom” in our Resolutions document, does the NEA support the choice to abort after the first trimester?

Response from the chair: Yes.

• Through the words “reproductive freedom” in our Resolutions document, does the NEA support a woman’s choice to abort after viability?

Response from the chair: Yes.

• Through the words “reproductive freedom” in our Resolutions document, does the NEA support the decision to abort up to, and including delivery, commonly termed by the media a “partial birth abortion?”

Response from the chair: We have NO limitations.

20 posted on 10/10/2014 7:00:16 AM PDT by paladinan (Rule #1: There is a God. Rule #2: It isn't you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson