Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

stupid too. Why not isolate the dog and get the valuable information on whether it’s readily transmitted to dogs. The only problem is, absence of Ebola doesn’t guarantee doggy immunity.


5 posted on 10/08/2014 1:03:53 PM PDT by Usagi_yo (Criticize, marginalize, demonize, criminalize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Usagi_yo

We already know that it is transmissable by dogs.
Read the stories coming out of Africa.
This was no knee-jerk unreasonable response.
This is rationality.


10 posted on 10/08/2014 1:10:16 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Usagi_yo

You cannot quarantine the dog and wait for symptoms. The dog will never show symptoms and will only be a carrier. This is a level 4 disease. Just holding him and testing him would be dangerous.


11 posted on 10/08/2014 1:13:10 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Usagi_yo

dogs are mmune. they can become carriers. that’s the concern.

unfortunately they didn’t wait and simply take’blood’from the dog every few’days while isolating him, and see if ebola virus was present.


14 posted on 10/08/2014 1:22:37 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson