Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: TADSLOS
I can perhaps see getting rid of SPC5 and above in the combat arms MOSs, but in the CS and CSS branches, I think it was a big mistake.

The Army was also kind of schizophrenic in its "every soldier a leader," rationale, because that very same argument should have/would have been the undoing of the warrant officer corps, but not long after the Army did away with advanced specialist rank, they made the warrant officer corps even more robust by adding the rank of CW5 and actually giving commissions to warrant officers once they pinned on CW2.

11 posted on 09/13/2014 7:54:58 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Joe 6-pack

The Army has never been known for being highly flexible in it’s institutional thinking with regards to rank/grade, leadership roles, schooling etc... Some of that has to do with locked in perceptions by senior grade officers and NCOs with their own agendas and some of it is budget/operational driven. Wartime has a way of cutting through the bs and fitting roles and ranks to what it takes to complete the wartime mission, but it’s usually a transient application that gets pushed aside in peacetime.


13 posted on 09/13/2014 8:08:53 AM PDT by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson