[WilliamofCarmichael]

. . . the self-indulgent children inhabiting Ferguson, Mo., were rewarded for throwing violent fits by reassurances from race hustlers (or civil rights leaders, if you prefer), reporters and even the President of the United States.

People attacked by blacks, et al indicating that the attacks are in response to Ferguson, Mo should absolutely pursue civil lawsuits naming the aforementioned personnel using the doctrine of vicarious liability.

Maybe that doctrine is why Sharpton cooled his rhetoric.

Race-grievance industry kingpin Al Sharpton said at Brown's funeral: "What does it require of us? We can’t have a fit; we’ve got to have a movement. A fit you get mad and run out for a couple of nights. A movement means we’ve got to be here for the long haul, and turn our chants into change, our demonstration into legislation, we have got to stay on this so we can stop this."

If the jury don't convict
you must have a fit.

And for far too many blacks that's become a Black Privilege.

[Cubs Fan]

People attacked by blacks, et al indicating that the attacks are in response to Ferguson, Mo should absolutely pursue civil lawsuits naming the aforementioned personnel using the doctrine of vicarious liability

Sounds like a good idea to me. Here's the first one I've read about. Sadly I epect more to follow.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2734860/Ex-Marine-left-brain-injury-pal-told-Waffle-House-wasn-t-safe-following-Ferguson-case-attacked-mob-20-people-parking-lot.html