Posted on 08/23/2014 4:22:33 AM PDT by marktwain
Jeffrey C. Barton |
A person, even in a no-shooting zone, still has the right to defend their person or their property, Golik said. In this case, based on the facts, there is a reasonable argument that Mr. Barton may have been defending his person and property when he fired in the air.Jeffrey C. Barton has an NRA supplied attorney, and says that a threat of a charge of "Obstructing a law enforcement officer" is also without merit:
The obstructing charge has not yet been made. Mr. Barton pled not guilty to the charge of illegally discharging a firearm in July of 2013, over a year ago.Barton said the obstruction charge also is groundless.
Tony Golik is desperately grasping at straws to keep out of a civil suit, Barton said. They have to charge me with something; theyve let this go on too long.
The shotgun blast joey plugs was talking about only applies to wives of rat politicians all others are guilty
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.