Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Cantor lost (in one image)
Bookwormroom.com ^ | 6-15-2014 | Bookworm

Posted on 06/16/2014 10:58:25 AM PDT by servo1969

The drive-by media is desperately trying to prove that Eric Cantor lost in the primary because he's Jewish, never mind the fact that the same 7th district in Virginia had elected him repeatedly before, despite knowing that he was Jewish. The truth is a little different:

Cantor's loss in one image

And no, the image doesn't mean Cantor lost because racist. It means that he lost because, despite calling himself a Republican and putting up a decent defense against Obama in 2009, Cantor's position on amnesty has become indistinguishable from Obama's. When that's combined with the images of Latin American young people, many of them ill, and many of them manifestly violent gang members, pouring over our southern borders, voters aren't going to like that.

And no, the immediately preceding statement doesn't mean Cantor lost because racist. It's not anti-Hispanic to be deeply troubled when your borders are overrun by lawbreakers carrying disease and crime. It's also not anti-Hispanic to find it upsetting that your president snubs his nose at the laws he swore to enforce and that your House Majority leader seems to think that's a fine idea.

Hat tip: Andrea Shea King, who blogs at Radio Patriot


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: amnesty; bookworm; cantor; gop; immigration; obama; teaparty
Now, that's a picture.
1 posted on 06/16/2014 10:58:25 AM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Not this image?


2 posted on 06/16/2014 11:04:14 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

As the media spreads more lies, the truth will come back to them in the end because they are each responsible for the untruths they print to the population. No one gets away with deliberate manipulations. With power, comes responsibility; from a much higher authority will judge them.


3 posted on 06/16/2014 11:11:15 AM PDT by Christie at the beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Cantor lost because he diverged so far from his party’s platform (and got so out of touch with his district) that a political unknown could beat him simply by running on the party platform.

Amnesty is probably the most significant, but I imagine spending/debt and failure to serious address Obamacare added up to.


4 posted on 06/16/2014 11:16:08 AM PDT by kevkrom (I'm not an unreasonable man... well, actually, I am. But hear me out anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Sam Hains
I enjoy looking at photos of Cantor before that smirk was wiped off his face.
6 posted on 06/16/2014 11:57:00 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hains
Why Cantor lost

Well, the other three won, through the primary stretch anyway, and the dumbass with the gum in his big mouth is the heir apparent to Cantor.

7 posted on 06/16/2014 11:57:30 AM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey

Boehner will lose as Speaker, if he has the nerve to run again. McConnell will lose in November to Grimes — with help from the Tea Party. McCarthy may very well lose to Labrador, leaving him out of the Leadership completely since he’s not in the race for Whip and Stutzman will likely take it.

The current GOP Leadership is on very shaky ground. Each one will lose their leadership position, but each will lose it in a different way.


8 posted on 06/16/2014 2:36:32 PM PDT by Sam Hains (Tea up support for McDaniel, Carr, Wolf, and Shannon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Hard to tell, but they look like they’re smiling. At least someone’s happy.


9 posted on 06/16/2014 3:35:29 PM PDT by OldNewYork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hains

So spunky & enlightening.

Thank goodness you found us three days ago!


10 posted on 06/16/2014 4:12:26 PM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson