Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Going to Pot? Colorado’s bold marijuana experiment is having some unexpected consequences
Slate ^ | May 21, 2014 | Josh Voorhees

Posted on 05/23/2014 12:15:28 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
Re: “I’ve always believed that one should be in control of their bodies at all times, except when in surgery.”

Under ObamaCare, the surgeon will be stoned.

41 posted on 05/23/2014 12:13:19 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Zippo44
Re: “One is no more “out of control” than after having a couple of beers.”

Zippo, track down your old dealers and get your money back.

You've been ripped off.

42 posted on 05/23/2014 12:19:33 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: mountainbunny
mountainbunny said: "They're tired of no-knock raids, ..."

I'm also tired of the gangsterism that accompanies illegal drug sales. If the price of MJ falls to where it should be, there will be few who could make a living on it. Such people will have to find a real job, flipping burgers or perhaps something that requires that they can read.

Perhaps then it might become safe to explore the Mendocino forest without the threat of being accosted by the guardians of illegal grow operations.

43 posted on 05/23/2014 5:29:12 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

Here in my area the local state rep introduced a bill to tax the he11 out of e cigs, he’s a big tobacco farmer and of course the state want its graft from their sale. I haven’t heard if it has passed but I am using them to quit smoking while keeping my weight down. Even though it saves lives they will still tax it out of existence, they are all still chasing the once mighty dollar.
Quick question salt for our roads went from 62 bucks/ton to 85.40 this year. What % increase is this, my local rag says 20%, I would like to know for sure since I figure in rough numbers in my head, not sure if I can even put it on paper, any help out there before I call and make an a55 out of myself? Looks slightly over 33% to me.


44 posted on 05/23/2014 5:39:59 PM PDT by Foundahardheadedwoman (God don't have a statute of limitations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Foundahardheadedwoman

Sounds like 28%


45 posted on 05/23/2014 5:53:15 PM PDT by eyedigress ((zOld storm chaser from the west)/ ?s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Foundahardheadedwoman

I got almost 38%.

Pretty much a math moron here, but seems to me the calculation is

85.4- 62 = 23.4
23.4/62 = 0.377
So 38% increase.

Does that look right to you?


46 posted on 05/23/2014 6:18:25 PM PDT by Bigg Red (1 Pt 1: As he who called you is holy, be holy yourselves in every aspect of your conduct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

Yep. I could not figure out the method, as I said I noticed that 62 from 85.4 is 23.4 x 3 the three being 1/3 so I got 33 plus a few %. That is how I figure odd aint it. I never figure anything to the exact figure just rough it out.


47 posted on 05/23/2014 9:12:21 PM PDT by Foundahardheadedwoman (God don't have a statute of limitations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Foundahardheadedwoman

I am guessing the genius who wrote the article you mentioned subtracted last year’s rate from this year’s and concluded that $23 must be about 20%.

As I said, I am a math moron, but, if I were publishing an article, I would make darned sure I had researched the math before I made such a statement. But I guess I am just old-fashioned. Today, our so-called journalists don’t even believe in proofreading.


48 posted on 05/24/2014 2:43:05 PM PDT by Bigg Red (1 Pt 1: As he who called you is holy, be holy yourselves in every aspect of your conduct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

I aint much of a speller but they spelled toys usage as in toys with the idea of running toyes. Don’t look right to me but as I said if it weren’t for spell check everything I write would be incomprehensible. Spell check that.


49 posted on 05/25/2014 10:36:30 PM PDT by Foundahardheadedwoman (God don't have a statute of limitations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Foundahardheadedwoman

I am not following your comment. I don’t see “toys” in the piece.


50 posted on 05/26/2014 4:45:30 AM PDT by Bigg Red (1 Pt 1: As he who called you is holy, be holy yourselves in every aspect of your conduct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson