To: TheProducer
The totalitarian meter just keeps rising with these jerks.
2 posted on
05/20/2014 11:54:02 AM PDT by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: TheProducer
Take anything that liberals say and remove the adjectives and adverbs.
3 posted on
05/20/2014 11:57:23 AM PDT by
First_Salute
(May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
To: TheProducer
By its very definition, a hate crime is a thought crime.
4 posted on
05/20/2014 12:01:07 PM PDT by
Hoodat
(Democrats - Opposing Equal Protection since 1828)
To: TheProducer
...it’s not that the liberal is stupid, it’s that he has made thinking into something he will not engage in. One of the best summaries of liberal thinking I've ever read, and falls squarely in line with my experience in trying to have a reasoned discussion with a liberal.
5 posted on
05/20/2014 12:01:34 PM PDT by
econjack
(I'm not bossy...I just know what you should be doing.)
To: TheProducer
That’s the definition of a so-called “hate crime”: legislating on thoughts rather than actions. Petersen is only figuring that out now?
7 posted on
05/20/2014 12:06:25 PM PDT by
Olog-hai
To: TheProducer
8 posted on
05/20/2014 12:11:24 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
To: TheProducer
Forty years ago, I observed that leftists explicitly believed that everyone agreed with them, because they were self-evidently correct. They openly said so; they were puzzled and hurt if anybody openly disagreed with what they said. Such persons must have ulterior motives, and had to be evil.
They still think and act that way.
9 posted on
05/20/2014 2:38:31 PM PDT by
VietVet
(I am old enough to know who I am and what I believe, and I 'm not inclined to apologize for any of)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson