Posted on 05/19/2014 7:43:36 AM PDT by Nachum
Souless, evil, bitch.
Stranger and stranger
The scripture says ‘IN’ your forehead or hand. Not ‘ON’.
Mark will be ‘IN’ not ‘ON’.
New transistor breaks speed recordPosted by null and void to TXnMA
On News/Activism ^ 04/15/2005 4:51:45 PM PDT · 120 of 148Oh, it was just a response to a comment on another thread about chipping kids as a kidnap countermeasure.
It occured to me that when "they" were ready to start chipping us all the'd need to sell the idea.
So I imagined an advertising campaign, star athletes, golf, tennis, baseball, etc. saying "It's all in the wrist".
You know, seeing a 7-10 split being knocked down, the smug bowler eyes the camera and says "It's all in the wrist™!" Then the voiceover says "If Joe Bowldownski is injured, the doctors can treat him faster because his medical records are always with him". Cut to Joe with a couple hot babes buying drinks with a wave of the hand. A sly wink, and "It's all in the wrist™!"...
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies
The false prophet or the AC could scratch that mark on their forehead on TV with a rusty nail and a week later every muslim in the middle east would do the same. If you did not have that mark not only would no one sell you anything but they would force you to do the same or chop off your head on the spot.
That makes more sense to me then being chipped. Here in the states we would find hundreds of ways around it but the Islamic horde would rip you to pieces first
As a matter of fact they could shove a 12 inch chip sideways up my kiester and I would still say Jesus is lord.
But if I am surrounded by an angry horde demanding I denounce Jesus and submit to islam or they will chop off my head, I better have some intestinal fortitude to yell JESUS IS LORD!!
Guess what - they already wear a “Seal” or “official stamp” of Allah on their arms and foreheads when they tie their arm and head bands saying “Bismallah” and with two crossed swords.
That’s where the idea came from. It is just a thought as I don’t believe the chip is the mark. God may not have revealed it yet so it is likely something we cannot imagine just yet.
The scripture says “charagma” meaning “badge of servitude”. Also, the Greek word “epi” in relation to the mark is used, which means either “upon” or “in.” The King James used the “word” in, because in many cases the charagma was etched in a slave’s forehead - but it also means a badge of servitude to a higher power.
Islam, of course, means submission or servitude.
They said this about tattoos, now they say it about microchips. It’s not the mark of the beast unless you willingly renounce Christ to receive it. No one will accidentally get the mark of the beast, you will know full well what you are doing when you get it.
So as long as I am not signing any contract or making any verbal declaration, I’m not worried.
I can see that, it makes sense. I think it is broader than that, though. Those that serve the beast will have the beast in thoughts and actions.
Kind of like how those that serve the beast do today.
Just ask a guy like Don Sterling - he didn’t have the mark in his thoughts and actions, and they’re trying to ruin him financially.
Think beyond the written word.
In it is.
Well, I would think that the Greek would be hypo and no epi in that case. Epi has the feeling of on the surface, while hypo has the feeling of in or under. Kind of like epidermis/hypodermic.
“Aw, whats da problem wid a lil’ chip?” - Marco D’Beast
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.