Michigan State University Administering Program On How To Unionize Employees

Michigan State University is administering a program called the Building Trades Academy that teaches techniques aimed at unionizing employees. In reaction, state lawmakers are threatening to make cuts to MSU’s appropriations unless the university agrees to make changes.

Sen. Tonya Schuitmaker, R-Lawton, chair of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on the higher education budget, said MSU’s administration of such a program is not an acceptable use of state appropriation dollars.

Sen. Tonya Schuitmaker, R-Lawton “Michigan State University, a public university, has taken over the duties of the National Labor College; a failed private entity previously run by the AFL-CIO,” Sen. Schuitmaker said. “The ‘Building Trades Academy’ in partnership with Michigan State University, and run by MSU’s School of Human Resources and Labor Relations, offers courses that are geared toward, and designed for ‘building trades union officers, agents and experienced organizers.’ ”

“Public universities should be in the business of educating students, not targeting Michigan job providers — a stated goal of one of these courses — for the purpose of meddling with the employer/employee relationship,” Sen. Schuitmaker added. “Most of Michigan's non-union employers have excellent relationships with their employees. The motivation behind this curriculum is to disrupt that relationship for the purpose of growing union coffers.”

Sen. Schuitmaker said she asked if she could attend the classes and was told that she could not. The classes are not open to the public and not available to the general undergraduate or graduate student body. Only those who can show proof of union membership are allowed to attend.

“In May of 2013 the MSU school of Human Resources and Labor Relations partnered to administer the Building Trades Academy,” Jason Cody, a spokesman for MSU told Capitol Confidential. “The academy is set up to provide useful information for union staff and leadership. They are four to five day seminars held off-site. Those who attend do not pay tuition to the university; their fees are paid by the Building Trades Union.”

“The academy does not advocate unionization,” Cody continued. “That’s not its goal.”

Capitol Confidential asked if the classes teach about “salting,” which is a labor union tactic involving the act of getting a job at a specific workplace with the intent of organizing a union.

Capitol Confidential pointed out that the curriculum was recently changed and asked if the previous curriculum included “salting.”

In fact, the previous curriculum did include “salting.” It has been removed from the MSU website, but Capitol Confidential obtained the previous curriculum, a portion of the course is described as instructing: “To make informed judgments on organizing and collective bargaining strategy – and to determine when legal counsel is required in a particular situation.” Under this section it also sates: “Topics that will be covered include paths to recognition, including salting, trigger agreements and other motivations, bargaining, including pre-hire and project agreements, multi-employer units and corporate change, traditional and nontraditional pressures, from strikes to corporate campaigns and preventive maintenance and protective planning.”

The curriculum for one class specifically says, "This course ... offers concrete strategies aimed at promoting organizing throughout the industry."

In an open letter to MSU president Lou Anna K. Simon, the Associated Builders and Contractors of Michigan (ABC), a statewide construction group, argued that the program lacks academic merit and that it was created by the building trades division of the AFL-CIO.

“Such activities lack legitimacy when performed by an academic institution,” said ABC-Michigan President Chris Fisher. “Would the university support a similar program geared toward union busting? Neither activity should be tolerated by the university staff, the Board of Trustees or the state legislature, which controls a significant portion of MSU’s budget.

“There may be a place for union organizing but it is through the union halls, not the halls of a public land-grant university,” Fisher continued. “Michigan taxpayers, both individual and business, need to be aware how their tax dollars are being spent.”

Because of MSU’s activity with the Building Trades Academy, the Senate version of the higher education budget, Senate Bill 768, currently includes a $500,000 cut in MSU’s appropriations and seems to suggest that the university could lose $500,000 each time it holds the seminars going forward.

The Senate Fiscal Agency explained it this way in its analysis of Senate Bill 768:

Prohibited Instruction Activity. The Senate reduced funding for MSU based on Section 271A [of the bill] which states intent that a public university shall not participate in any instructional activity that encourages or discourages union organizing of employees and provides for a $500,000 penalty for each occurrence.

Rep. Al Pscholka, R-Stevensville, who chairs the House Appropriations Subcommittee on the higher education budget, said the situation is in flux while talks take place between the legislative leaders and MSU officials.

“We will be going into a conference committee (over Senate bill 768) and this is definitely something we’re taking a good hard look at,” Rep. Pscholka said. “We are talking to Michigan State University. One possibility is a suspension of enrollment until changes are made to the program. We’re looking forward to working with the Senate on a final resolution.”

Sen. Schuitmaker said that the course description (or curriculum) was changed after she discovered that MSU was administering the program. However, she argues that even the newly changed description is troubling; specifically she points to the following:

“This course offers… ways of promoting organizing throughout the industry [and]… concentrating on issues related to workforce organizing-identifying, contacting, and communicating directly with unrepresented workers.”

In 2010, Wayne State University had documents promoting unionization and organizing on its website. Much of the material was removed after a Capitol Confidential exposé.

It’s interesting to go back to the 1300s and note how a university existed to provide knowledge to students, and how today...it’s simply a dumping ground for kids to pretend they get education and walk away with a certificate.

MSU’s Board of Trustees are on the ballot every four years, along with the Governor. The voters can put a stop to this.

If someone wants to learn how to organize unions the AFL-CIO runs their own National Labor College outside D.C.

MSU’s Board of Trustees are on the ballot every four years, along with the Governor. The voters can put a stop to this.

Exactly. In Michigan we could sweep the entire state level and public college education administration from power in one fell swoop if the people would pay enough attention to do it.

BTW, I encourage people from outside Michigan to lean on us to get out the vote for conservative education positions.

Unfortunately when I lived in Michigan the only Board of Regents election that really seemed to get people motivated was over whether or not George Perles would get the A.D. job.

Michigan is very fortunate. Here in Pennsylvania we have NO recourse at the ballot box against things like the Jerry Sandusky tragedy. Or against “state related” private institutions like Pitt flushing taxpayer money down ratholes.

If the people who voted for Mitt Romney in 2012 had voted for conservatives for university administration ans state board of education positions, we would have run the table on all of them.

Unfortunately, only a fraction of those people even bothered to vote in those races at all and most went to hard left union activists.

Its also important to note that if you vote straight ticket in Michigan and there are multiple people from 1 party, those races will be left blank. You can still vote straight ticket but you have to specifically vote for candidates in those races for them to be counted.

Just like how here they tend to slide in major ballot initiatives raising taxes or doing other things desired by the Left on off-year primary ballots, where most Republican races aren’t contested, and thus few Republicans bother to show up at the polls.

In 2012 I voted on the same local school issue 3 times in a period of about 3 months. The first 2 times were on the same day as state and presidential primaries and it failed and the 3rd time it was a single issue ballot on a random weekday a couple weeks before the general election and it passed.

The law has since been tightened and school votes have to take place on specific days.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.