You guys with the science fetish crack me up, I’ve found that most of these studies are completely worthless as they were set up to prove whatever it was they wanted proven and really are meaningless and totally worthless. As a case in point:
http://www.nature.com/news/publishers-withdraw-more-than-120-gibberish-papers-1.14763
seems that even the vaunted “peer reviewed” paper chase is not what it seems any more.
I can understand why you’ve got your panties in a bunch though as if people wake up to this scam you’ll be without a job. It all boils down to that in the medical industry, money and really nothing more than that which is why I distrust it so much.
I’ve found that most of these studies are completely worthless as they were set up to prove whatever it was they wanted proven and really are meaningless and totally worthless.
<><><><><
Most of what studies? How many have you reviewed out of what sized population?
I’m not a science guy. Not a big fan of big pharma. I have 2 kids who coach/teach in private schools and they believe that 75% of the kids are on ADHD medicine. That seems crazy to me.
I’m a manager in corporate setting. No connection to the sciences at all.
However, you stated categorically that one could learn something from wandering children’s graveyards and correlating their deaths to the vaccine schedule.
I simply asked what your particular results were from doing so. It’s abundantly clear that you have never done so and are relying on someone else’s research, or made it up out of whole cloth.