The miserable secretaries of state have the gaul to claim that all they are required to do is take the candidate's application and slap his/her name on the official state ballot. They would have us believe that their highly paid taxpayer position places no responsibility/duty on them to prevent fraud on the voters of their state. It is all surreal and mindboggling. Fingers are pointed in each others direction and no one wants to do their damn job.
Pelosi’s signature is on the eligibility doc, the feckless GOP will do nothing to bring this to an end result because they to have skeletons in thier closet or are being paid under the table. They are all complicit in this.
chicken
bock bock bock baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaak
Using partisan state officials to deny a candidate access to their ballot is potentially a double-edged sword. Enough blue states have sufficiently corrupt officials that they could tie up their ballot long enough to keep conservative candidates off their ballots and potentially skew every future election. As much as I’d like to see Obama exposed we need to take care we don’t manufacture a weapon that will be used against us. An example of this might be Harry Reid’s “nuclear option.” It works fine for the Democrats while they maintain control of the Senate, but how will they fare when they eventually lose and that option is still in place for Republicans to use. (BTW, I fully expect the Republicans will eliminate their advantage at the first opportunity and they may be right in leveling the playing field again as unfair advantage breeds a lot of hard feelings. I just hope we get a chance to undo some damage perpetrated by the Obama administration first.)
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah...........
(The law may be CLEAR, but we’re not a-gonna TOUCH it!)
..........ba blah, blah, blah!)
This is not what the framers of the U.S. Constitution envisioned.
I have had a consistent position on this since 2009.
It is this: There is a proper, Constitutional forum to address the question. That forum did so on January 6, 2009, and the matter is at an end as regards the person calling himself “Obama”.
There was plenty of relevant evidence to allow the Special Joint Session of Congress to investigate. It was known to everyone with a keyboard and a monitor, and it was certainly known to the participants in the session.
All that was required was a written objection, from ONE SINGLE Member of Congress and ONE SINGLE Senator. No such objection was raised, and “Obama” was certified by the presiding officer (Richard “Dick” Cheney of Wyoming).
That was the end of the matter. The power of Congress to count the Electoral votes and to certify a President-Elect is plenary, there is no avenue for appeal.
At least “defend the ten” Roy Moore stays true to his conservative and religious convictions!
“First, the dishonesty is shameless and in your face. Mr Obama’s advisers, once they realized the ‘birth certificate’ was as bogus as a $3 bill, knew that if they simply went on pretending that $3 bills are legal tender the hard-left-dominated news media would carefully and continuously look the other way, pausing occasionally to sneer at anyone who pointed out that, in this constitutionally crucial respect, the ‘president’ has no clothes,” Monckton wrote.
The one known as "obama" answers to someone or something and they now own US.
And they, getting in your face, will laughingly tell you there's not a damn thing you can do about it.
By their fruits ye shall know them. Demonrats are evil and/or follow and enable evil, whether they realize it or not.
Welcome to their brave new world. Please pass the soma.
What Is The Secretary of State Project? [Soros money to distort elections]
fl
The Eligibility Clause of the U.S. Constitution is used after the President-elect takes the Oath of Office to become the President of the United States. It cannot be used to prevent a President-elect from taking the oath because the President-elect has the option to respectfully decline to take the oath. Before giving the oath, the justice announced he/she is about to give the oath; thus, giving the President-elect an opportunity to decline the take the oath due to an ineligibility.
If an ineligible President assumes the Office of the President of the United States, then the only thing a concerned citizen can do is file a complaint in U.S. District Court and object to seek an exemption from the laws, rules, executive orders and appointments made by the usurper.
Impeachment or his resignation (it's more likely the sun wont come up tomorrow) would be much preferable.
Eligibility ping...
The title of the WND article on the 7-2 Alabama case is misleading, but Chief Justice Moore did make some very interesting comments...
Before the election, oversight boards say that we have to wait until after the election to see if there is "harm," and after the elections they say a complaint should have been investigated before the election.
-PJ