when it doesn't go in the RAT/union favor...
Posted on 02/23/2014 7:29:22 AM PST by rickmichaels
Volkswagen’s first foray into America’s automotive manufacturing industry was, by all accounts, a disaster. Less than six months after the company opened a plant in Pennsylvania in 1978, workers went on strike for higher wages and the company was hit with a series of union-backed lawsuits. The factory lasted just 10 years.
It took Volkswagen more than two decades to venture back into the U.S. and, when it did, with a $1-billion assembly plant that opened in 2011, it chose Tennessee, a place where being anti-union is considered as patriotic as apple pie. The Southern U.S. has built itself into an automotive powerhouse, largely by luring major foreign automakers like Volkswagen with hefty tax breaks, cheap energy and, most important, a low-wage, staunchly anti-union workforce. No place has benefited more from that anti-union messaging than Tennessee, where the automotive industry has attracted $30 billion worth of investment and now employs close to 100,000 workers, more than any other Southern state.
All of that was thrown into turmoil this month, when the officials with the United Automobile Workers held a vote to unionize workers at Volkswagen’s plant in Chattanooga, Tenn. The narrow loss — 712 to 626 — is a devastating blow to the UAW, which had hoped the vote would mark a turning point for an organization that has struggled with declining membership and has been rebuffed by Southern manufacturing workers for decades.
Since he took over the helm of the UAW in 2010, Bob King has set his sights on the Southern auto industry as a fertile new battleground in the fight to save the American labour movement. But the renewed focus on the South comes at an unusual moment in U.S. manufacturing history, as recession-weary Northern states such as Michigan and Indiana adopt Southern-style anti-union legislation, known as right-to-work laws, in hopes of rebuilding their industrial base.
The Volkswagen vote wasn’t the first union drive at a foreign automaker south of the Mason-Dixon line. It was, however, according to labour analysts, the most organized and promising campaign ever waged in the South. In an unusual twist, the union also had the backing of Volkswagen’s board of directors, which is required to have strong worker representation under German corporate law.
The campaign sparked a fierce outcry among Republican politicians in the state, worried it was the start of a slippery slope to mass unionization. Sen. Bob Corker, who was mayor of Chattanooga at the time the city was looking to lure Volkswagen, warned that state officials would likely cut off the flow of hundreds of millions of dollars worth of tax breaks and subsidies to the company if its workers joined the UAW. The economic damage wrought by the union drive, he said, “would last for generations to come.” Americans for Tax Reform, the lobby group run by anti-tax advocate Grover Norquist, rented more than a dozen billboards around Chattanooga papered with slogans like, “Auto unions ate Detroit. Next meal: Chattanooga” and “The UAW Wants Your Guns.”
“People act as though this is Attila the Hun coming over the hill,” says William Canak, a labour relations expert at Middle Tennessee State University. “The opposition is quite strong, because one crack in the dam would encourage people [to unionize], and perhaps not only in the automobile industry.”
Workers in Tennessee have long resisted the call of unions over fears they would scare away jobs, not to mention Republican voters’ resentment that unions are powerful financial backers of the Democrats.
The housing meltdown and the protracted recession that followed left many workers thankful just to have jobs. But, five years after the financial crisis, Tennessee’s economy is now booming. Employment in the state’s automotive industry has been among the fastest-growing in the country since the recession, according to a recent study by the Brookings Institution. Wages for full-time workers at the Volkswagen plant are comparatively high, averaging around $20 an hour. Still, many of the new jobs in Tennessee’s auto factories have been low-wage, temporary, contract positions, the study found. The average manufacturing worker in the state earns just $9.10 an hour. Analysts say economic recovery, coupled with the explosion of temporary contract work and broad concerns over income inequality, has emboldened workers in the state to start demanding better treatment from employers. “The emergence from the recession has been pretty good in Tennessee,” says Daniel Cornfield, labour sociologist at Vanderbilt University in Nashville. “So, in periods of economic growth and inequality, unions usually do pretty well.”
The state recorded the fastest unionization rate in the country last year, though that was largely thanks to employment growth at previously unionized plants, including a UAW-organized General Motors plant in Spring Hill. Unions have also have scored small victories in other Southern states. In recent years, the UAW has managed to unionize automotive parts suppliers in Alabama and Kentucky. Business officials, secure in the thought that their workforce was inherently opposed to unions, have suffered some nasty surprises. “Employers know and treat their workers well, so there’s no need to unionize,” the head of the Georgia Chamber of Commerce confidently told an Atlanta newspaper last year, shortly before 500 food service workers at Atlanta’s airport, the world’s busiest, opted to unionize.
But while union votes are typically grassroots efforts, driven by workers angry about wages and working conditions, in Volkswagen’s case the union drive was, unusually, a top-down affair that represented a coordinated international effort between the UAW and Germany’s powerful auto union.
Under German law, large corporations must have a two-tiered board structure, one half of which is a supervisory board split evenly between executives and employee representatives. It has the power to hire senior managers and determine major business decisions. Worker representatives on the board threatened to block new investment at the Chattanooga plant unless the UAW was allowed to organize. “Volkswagen’s image as a socially concerned company is on the line,” says Michael Fichter, a labour relations expert at the Free University of Berlin. “The workers’ representatives have said you’ve got to uphold this position, even in the United States, because the company’s reputation is based on the fact we have a culture in which we co-operate.”
It wasn’t a threat the company was prepared to take lightly. Volkswagen has struggled to gain a foothold in the U.S., where sales of its vehicles fell 19 per cent last month. Central to its growth strategy is launching a new crossover SUV by 2016, which the company plans to build in Chattanooga. “The U.S. is one of those linchpin markets they want to catapult them to become the No. 1 automaker globally,” says Mike Wall, an auto analyst with IHS. “Bringing out new products is super-critical right now.”
But aside from highlighting the culture clash between German automakers and their operations in the U.S. South, observers say the Volkswagen experience has opened up a critical new “German-style” model for how American unions approach traditionally anti-union states. Large German companies organize “works councils,” plant-level boards made up of both management and blue-collar employees who decide many of the plant-specific issues normally done through collective bargaining, such as shift schedules. It was the push from German auto unions to establish such a “works council” in Chattanooga that initially encouraged the UAW to try to run a full-scale union drive at the plant. As part of its Volkswagen campaign, however, the UAW agreed to give up some traditional responsibilities for settling shop-floor issues to the works council, a body that would be open to both union and non-union employees. Fichter says such a model could be used to win over skeptical employees at other German plants in the South that are the focus of UAW union efforts, including a Mercedes-Benz factory in Tuscaloosa, Ala., and a BMW plant in Spartanburg, S.C.
Despite the failed vote, both the UAW and Volkswagen’s union representatives, have also signaled they’re not giving up the fight at Chattanooga. Bernd Osterloh, head of the German automaker’s global works council, was planning fly to Chattanooga to find alternate way of creating a works council at the plant. He told a German newspaper that union representatives on the company’s board would block the construction of any new plant in the South unless Chattanooga employees organized. (It’s likely an empty threat, since auto analysts say there’s little chance of Volkswagen building a new plant anywhere in the U.S. anytime soon and Osterloh avoided saying whether union officials would follow through with their earlier threat to block expansion at the Chattanooga plant.)
This week, the UAW announced it was appealing the results of the union vote to the National Labor Relations Board, alleging excessive “outside interference.”
But just as the American unions are adding new tools to their arsenal, anti-union activists have promised to double-down on the fight to protect Southern manufacturing from organized labour. “I don’t see the anti-union forces that have come out in such full force in Chattanooga just laying down their arms after this,” says Fichter. “They’ll be out there in Tuscaloosa and Spartanburg and wherever the UAW comes up.” If anything, the Battle for Dixie has just begun.
This week, the UAW announced it was appealing the results of the union vote to the National Labor Relations Board, alleging excessive “outside interference.”
So uhh Bob at the UAW, mind if we look in to the UAW’s “excessive outside interference”? I thought so...
UAW = Detroit
Since when is a loss by over 15% of the vote a "narrow loss"?
Unions are bound and determined to destroy manufacturing in America.
when it doesn't go in the RAT/union favor...
Actually it was 53%-47%....still wouldn’t call it “narrow”
6.4%, not 15%
The thugs are crying and will strong arm employees into changing their vote if there is another vote.
It's all part of the new math - when the actual number difference is greater than the percentage number, then you use the actual number because it makes it look like a closer margin.
Of course, they do it exactly the opposite when on a larger scale and when they have won. In that case a 0.002 percentage of victory can be expressed as 722,000 votes...
It looks like VW Chattanooga workers are making more than current UAW “Tier 2” employees at GM/F/Chry.
That can’t be a strong selling point for the union.
Then subtract 2 hours a month pay for union dues.
If the results had been reversed. The union and the MSM
would be calling it a landslide victory of epic proportions in favor of unions through out the country, especially in the South.
I agree that thee Obama appointed NLRB may very well go along with the UAW. There are 2 things at play her though. The first is the UAW is taking a big gamble because if they get a re-vote, it may be a worse outcome than the 1st vote and that would be the death of organizing activity in the South and maybe the UAW as currently constituted. The 2nd thing is the Supreme Court could well rule in June that the Obama recess appointments of the NLRB were unconsitutional and the net result of that ruling would be to void any decisions made by this NLRB.
Germany is a ‘socialist’ country. Different laws, different history.
Why should a requirement in German for “Workers” (a Commie term) boards be binding here i the USofA, a different country....
UAW must be ‘reaching out’ to their socialist brother in der Fatherland....
UAW - the Union of AntiAmerican Workers. Just say no to the unions, the destroyer of American Jobs.
Since VW wants the union, what is to stop them from going to Michigan, hiring 100 pro-union zealots and giving them jobs at the plant in Chattanooga just before the NLRB orders another vote?
If VW really wanted the UAW they could have taken over an abandoned Big Three plant in Michigan or Ohio for *much* less than they shelled out in Tennessee.Something doesn’t add up here.
Well VW tried that in 1978 (Chrysler plant Westmoreland Penna) and it failed. So they learned half a lesson anyway.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.