Skip to comments.
Mr. Speaker, We Agree that You Can't Trust Him; Can't We Agree On Impeachment Too?
Mononymous1/Wordpress ^
| 2/6/2014
| Mononymous1
Posted on 02/06/2014 12:41:12 PM PST by mononymous
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Any chance they'd act on it? Probably not.
To: mononymous
2
posted on
02/06/2014 12:41:36 PM PST
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: mononymous
Impeachment would be counterproductive and do nothing but stir up sympathy for him. The idiots who elected him need to have their noses rubbed in it really, really good. Impeachment is best launched when the moronic set has finally had enough and when we have enough votes in the senate to actually do something about it. That time is not now.
Meanwhile, let him be the anchor who draws just as many Democrats down to defeat with him as is possible.
3
posted on
02/06/2014 12:45:23 PM PST
by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: mononymous
I like the description of Obunga attributed to Putin; “Negotiating with O is like playing chess with a pigeon: The pigeon knocks over all the pieces, shits on the board and then struts around as though it won the game.”
Why do the Caspar Milquetoasts in the Republicrat party waste their efforts trying....After all this futile time?
4
posted on
02/06/2014 1:02:03 PM PST
by
Tucker39
("Having their conscience seared with a hot iron.")
To: Tucker39
5
posted on
02/06/2014 1:04:54 PM PST
by
Lee'sGhost
(Johnny Rico picked the wrong girl!)
To: Tucker39
I like that; I also like ~’grow a pair or borrow Pelosi’s’
6
posted on
02/06/2014 1:06:57 PM PST
by
txhurl
To: MrB
7
posted on
02/06/2014 1:07:30 PM PST
by
mononymous
(http://mononymous1.wordpress.com)
To: Vigilanteman
I agree which is why I said, keep it for after the elections. I think, however, it should be done if for no other reason than to set an example that this kind of crap cannot and will not be done without consequence - no matter what happens in the Senate!
8
posted on
02/06/2014 1:10:08 PM PST
by
mononymous
(http://mononymous1.wordpress.com)
To: Tucker39
That’s a pretty cool description which I had not seen - thanks for sharing it. Did Putin actually say it? I am amazed that he would.
9
posted on
02/06/2014 1:11:36 PM PST
by
mononymous
(http://mononymous1.wordpress.com)
To: mononymous
To: morphing libertarian
Would be nice but probably not because of what MrB said...
11
posted on
02/06/2014 1:14:14 PM PST
by
mononymous
(http://mononymous1.wordpress.com)
To: mononymous; finney
To: mononymous
Elections have consequences. It’s time we show that duplicity has consequences, too.
To: mononymous
When this guy leaves office (if he ever leaves) his followers will say he started out a good buy but the republicans forced him to turn bad.
14
posted on
02/06/2014 1:51:16 PM PST
by
VerySadAmerican
(".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
To: mononymous
15
posted on
02/06/2014 2:10:16 PM PST
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: MrB
The legal term, which a freeper posted so it must be true, is pigmentation immunity.
16
posted on
02/06/2014 2:27:46 PM PST
by
Jacquerie
(In avowed socialist countries, the central planners are mathematicians, scientists. Ours are lawyers)
To: Jacquerie
Negotiating with O is like playing chess with a pigeon: The pigeon knocks over all the pieces, shits on the board and then struts around as though it won the game.....
Priceless!
17
posted on
02/06/2014 2:45:31 PM PST
by
DaveA37
To: morphing libertarian
Impeach and .......remove!Ah! An important follow-up to impeachment. Bill Clinton's still in our faces.
18
posted on
02/06/2014 4:00:51 PM PST
by
IIntense
To: VerySadAmerican
When did we care what Obama’s followers say? We should ignore all the PC crap while we’re at it. Just sayin’.
19
posted on
02/06/2014 4:05:03 PM PST
by
IIntense
To: IIntense
We don’t. But that’s what they’ll say. A liberal will never admit IT was wrong.
I meant to post they’d say he was a good “guy”.
20
posted on
02/06/2014 4:28:27 PM PST
by
VerySadAmerican
(".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson