Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

O’Reilly’s interview with Obama sends a liberal climbing the walls: What he had to say
Coach is Right ^ | 2/4/14 | Kevin "Coach" Collins

Posted on 02/04/2014 10:57:28 AM PST by Oldpuppymax

The interests of full disclosure require me to acknowledge that I have never liked Bill O’Reilly (BOR).

This said, I will nevertheless comment, not on his interview of Barack Obama Sunday night, but rather on a critique of his work offered by a Marc Ambinder who was sent careening off the walls by BOR’s “ridiculous” interview of Obama. Fair enough, let’s take a look at what Ambinder had to say.

After the obligatory liberal attack on Fox News and a completely incongruent, but equally obligatory swipe at Sean Hannity, Ambinder attempted to establish that he was disappointed because BOR’s questions were not sufficiently tough. He smugly babbles about “the real world”...

(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Health/Medicine; Politics
KEYWORDS: barackobama; billoreilly; foxnews

1 posted on 02/04/2014 10:57:28 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

Actually, the original article does ask some good questions and makes some good points, e.g.:

“A much better question, one that should have occurred to every Obama-hating producer at Fox News, is this: “Mr. President, can you provide one example of when you held someone specifically accountable for a major screwup? One example? Over five years?” And if Obama prevaricated, then O’Reilly could have asked Obama why he seems to go out of his way not to hold his political appointees publicly accountable for mistakes of omission or commission.

But instead, O’Reilly entered the imaginary world of conspiracies and cover-ups and let the president off easy.”

He’s right.


2 posted on 02/04/2014 11:28:35 AM PST by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax
After the obligatory liberal attack on Fox News and a completely incongruent, but equally obligatory swipe at Sean Hannity, Ambinder attempted to establish that he was disappointed because BOR’s questions were not sufficiently tou

Ambinder, looking for knowledge and insight.


3 posted on 02/04/2014 11:33:54 AM PST by USS Alaska (If I could...I would.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

I didn’t watch the interview because I knew I would be disappointed by BOR.

Sounds like I was right.


4 posted on 02/04/2014 11:37:51 AM PST by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

“But instead, O’Reilly entered the imaginary world of conspiracies and cover-ups and let the president off easy.”

That in itself is a victory for conservatives. Obama’s non-answers and evasions weren’t exactly hard to spot. BO’R didn’t need to be a hard-ass, and it was a better play to be respectful and let Barry be his own worst enema


5 posted on 02/04/2014 12:04:28 PM PST by Smedley (It's a sad day for American capitalism when a man can't fly a midget on a kite over Central Park)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson