Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain
One police agency in Maine sold the guns that they collected and gave the money to charity. Either option would make more sense than simply destroying valuable property.

Except that the NAALCP buyback was done under the premise that their program reduced the number of guns in circulation. If they do not melt down these guns, then they should be charged with fraud and prosecuted to the full extent of the law. For every gun sold, the former owner should be located, and the NAALCP should be forced to compensate each former owner for the full amount which each gun was sold.

3 posted on 01/19/2014 10:48:18 AM PST by Hoodat (Democrats - Opposing Equal Protection since 1828)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Hoodat

“Except that the NAALCP buyback was done under the premise that their program reduced the number of guns in circulation. If they do not melt down these guns, then they should be charged with fraud and prosecuted to the full extent of the law. For every gun sold, the former owner should be located, and the NAALCP should be forced to compensate each former owner for the full amount which each gun was sold.”

But the idea that it would reduce the number in circulation is fraudulent on its face, unless it is only a temporary and local measure. Reducing the number of used guns available in the market just increases the demand for new guns.


4 posted on 01/19/2014 12:43:10 PM PST by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson