lavonta, lavonta, lavonta...your logic is flawed.
Two wrongs? Outlaws with guns...WRONG; law abiding citizens with a gun, Second Amendment RIGHT; RIGHT?
Where is the second wrong?
Maybe your logic is the second WRONG.
Funny how they turn into “Gun-Free Blood Zones” anyhow.
lavonta, lavonta, lavonta...your logic is flawed.
Two wrongs? Outlaws with guns...WRONG; law abiding citizens with a gun, Second Amendment RIGHT; RIGHT?
Where is the second wrong?
Maybe your logic is the second WRONG.
Wee, they’re gonna make a stern finger wag....more stern!
That’ll show the criminals!
Just like when it worked in Sandy Hook Connecticut!
/ sarc
People often look at Kansas’ old laws against carrying guns in the cow towns of the 1800s. They forget that such laws were only enforced against Texas Cowboys wanting to shoot up the town or cause trouble.
Once, in Wichita, a cowboy was in jail, for carrying a gun. A large group of armed cowboys came to get him out. Only ONE sheriff stood between them.
Someone rang the alarm bell, and suddenly there was a large group of ARMED CITIZENS of Wichita there to back up the sheriff.
The cowboy crowd dispersed quickly, and quietly got rid of their guns in bushes and dark alleys.
The citizens were not disarmed.
If a person is willing to do illegal harm with a weapon, then ignoring a simple sign that forbids people from having weapons on the premises will not be much of a deterrent.
Oh come on now! Why wouldn’t a criminal obey the sign?