Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va

central_va wrote:
“Actually it is easier to ram the round ball into a smooth bore, as such that part is faster. The musket priming is the time consuming part. I have never fired a musket but that is what I am told.”

Fitting in reality a primer cap onto a tube’s end, and the primer cap size is the thumb-pushing end of a Bic Clic, can be a bear. Not much easier with a flintlock - with flashpan powder being of a finer grainage than the barrel powder - making it a two-flask operation.


51 posted on 11/19/2013 8:37:45 AM PST by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Terry L Smith

I would say the rate of fire of smooth bore vs rifled musket are about the same.


52 posted on 11/19/2013 8:42:00 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Terry L Smith

“... with flashpan powder being of a finer grainage than the barrel powder - making it a two-flask operation.”

By the 1770s loose powder poured from the flask was not used in combat.

To the greatest extent possible, troops were supplied with pre-loaded cartridges. The cartridge was torn open, pan primed first, then barrel loaded.

This did cause a less-than-efficient use of powder granulation: the main charge worked better with a coarse granulation, while the pan charge worked better with fine granulation. A balance was struck - cartridges were loaded with intermediate granulations.


54 posted on 11/23/2013 9:29:55 AM PST by schurmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson