To: Nachum
She’s not talking about the First Amendment- she’s talking about a proposed reporter’s shield law, which would be, yes, a privilege.
To: Conscience of a Conservative
A shield law is unnecessary with a First Amendment.
What don’t they understand ?
7 posted on
10/31/2013 6:08:15 PM PDT by
Eric in the Ozarks
("Say Not the Struggle Naught Availeth.")
To: Conscience of a Conservative
Shes not talking about the First Amendment- shes talking about a proposed reporters shield law, which would be, yes, a privilege. Which means that when Matt Drudge originally reported on Monica Lewinsky, he would not have been protected.
I don't like it.
8 posted on
10/31/2013 6:15:00 PM PDT by
Nachum
(Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson