Posted on 10/11/2013 6:07:56 AM PDT by jsanders2001
Okay so we all just read this claim by a "supposedly" ex-CIA guy named Dr. Jim Garrow who makes a claim that he is ex-CIA and that he knows that Obama had Andrew Breitbart and Tom Clancy killed. It doesn't have a ring of truth to it if you've ever worked in an intelligence related capacity for the following reasons: (1) people in the intel industries compartmentalize information to such an extent that he would never know that information unless the president himself or the assassin told him directly and I don't see that happening, (2) real CIA guys wouldn't open their trap and make this claim if Obama had done it because guess who's next buddy boy?, and (3) why would the CIA have a need for him given his background? They typically choose people with special talents or connections and recruit them as "agents" and don't share much knowledge with them other than what they need to know and usually just give them specific assignments.
I think the guy is in need of money and did it for publicity and made the outrageous statement for attention because he knows it's very provocative. That and the fact that the right wing is looking for a savior to bail them out the clutches of this evil admiistration and will probably buy his books to support him. Here's something I came across written several years ago which sheds some light on his background and peronality type:
http://research-china.blogspot.com/2012/03/review-of-jim-garrows-pink-pagoda.html
Any comments on what you know about the guy before today?
Threat = thread
If anyone killed Breitbart the assassin would have no clue about Tom Clancy. Only the President or the CIA Director would be able to connect the dots.
The guy’s statements don’t have a ring of truth to them IMO.
Follow the Money. When someone says it's not about the money, it's ALWAYS about the money.
#4 - If he really thought it was true that the government was assassinating people, wouldn’t he be a little more afraid of revealing that secret info to the public? If Obama is going to kill Breitbart and Clancy, he certainly would have no qualms shutting this guy up.
Whatever his background, it wouldn’t surprise me if his claim is true. This is exactly the sort of thing that fits Obama’s “moral code” perfectly.
B was hit, how the hit was made and by whom is well known.
C was fed info for some time, also well known.
I’ll bite, because it is not well-known to me. Who made the hit on Breitbart and how?
It is, in detail, on the threat matrix.
The murder weapon was a common and easy to get chemical mixed in his wine. The chemical leaves the telltale red band across the top of the head reminiscent of some strokes but otherwise nothing, as it very quikcly leaves no trace in the body.
Breitbart had the glass of wine with a democrat small functionary. This functionary had easy access to the stuff in his work.
What it is is simply the driver compound for an airbag. Tasteless and disappearing. Tiny dosage will blow your brain out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.