[John O]

I see nothing in the Constitution that allows any judge to infringe on ANYONE’S right to keep and bear arms.

[Bloody Sam Roberts]

I see nothing in the Constitution that allows any judge to infringe on ANYONE’S right to keep and bear arms.

Exactly. These morons can't seem to get it through their thick skulls that a God given right cannot be removed. We The People are endowed by our Creator with certain UNALIENABLE rights. Governments instituted among men do NOT have the power to infringe upon or remove ANY of these rights as given by our Creator.

Ergo, their 'decision' is fallacious at the outset and void.

[supercat]

I see nothing in the Constitution that allows any judge to infringe on ANYONE’S right to keep and bear arms.

I don't think it plausible that anyone ever intended that Second Amendment rights applied to slaves; the Thirteenth Amendment allows persons convicted of serious crimes to be made slaves of the state, and as such would justify the disarmament of such persons.

On the other hand, what does it mean for something to be a "right" if infringement would not constitute a deprivation of liberty which requires due process?