Hardly surprising given it's a massive tourist hotspot. Next up you'll be shocked that a curry house seems to be staffed entirely by Bagladeshis - OH MY GOD - WE HAVE SURRENDERED THE NATION!
OK then - what about the area around Wembley? Every woman in a burqa. Tower Hamlets? Women can’t walk the street without being called some variation on prostitute thanks to the rabid Muslim locals. Brixton? West Ham?
40% of those living in London, not tourists, bonehead....which is HUGE. No city in the USA even comes close.
Try reading the whole article, or is English not your 1st language?
Your islet of logic has been submerged quickly.
You claim that a tourist area is not representative.
You are then confronted with areas almost wholly inhabited by immigrants and where foreign cultures reign supreme, unchallenged and even encouraged by prior governments and bureaucrats. This is not a ‘stopping off’ point - it is an avenue, a haven.
Other areas ARE permanently occupied by immigrants and/or their offspring. Permanent doesn’t get more ‘representative’ than that, despite your conveniently shifting definition.