The pope made her do it
Pope’s fault
Hmm, has the Blaze ever noted that about the NY Times, Wash. Post, or any of the alphabet TV news outlets?
Funny how this pathetic excuse of a president has video footage of an alleged chemical weapons attack, but we have never seen so much as a snapshot of a dead bin Laden.
Hmmm?
Oh dear Lord. Please protect this woman.
It’s a tossup. I don’t trust Russia any more than I trust Obama’s minions. They are both habitual liars and propagandists.
I keep waiting for someone to explain chemical weapons to the public, but I guess that doesn’t fit Obama’s agenda. We have military personnel who are highly trained in chemical weapon use. I was not a Chemical Officer, but I will try to provide a little information on chemical weapons. A chemical attack is not a miles wide cloud of gas rolling across the terrain. Chemical weapons are affected by: wind; rain; heat; sunlight; humidity; terrain; volume; means of dispersal. Chemical weapons are dispersed by spraying or from exploding projectiles. Spraying can be by aircraft or from vehicles or by pumping it out of cans. Chemical missile or artillery rounds are about as instantly lethal as high explosives with shrapnel against people without chemical protective gear. Persistent chemical agents remain in the area for awhile and are harmful if you directly breathe them or touch them with exposed skin. They degrade with time based on environmental conditions. The people using chemical weapons have to be concerned that the chemicals don’t blow back on them if the wind shifts. In most instances, it is not a precise weapon. Tear gas is a chemical weapon. There are chemical weapons that make you sick to your stomach. There has been experimentation with using hallucinogenic drugs as chemical weapons. I suppose that an enemy providing drugs to your populace is guilty of chemical warfare. Maybe this will bring out the experts.
Mother Agnes: I have carefully studied the footage, and I will present a written analysis on it a bit later. I maintain that the whole affair was a frame-up. It had been staged and prepared in advance with the goal of framing the Syrian government as the perpetrator.
The key evidence is that Reuters made these files public at 6.05 in the morning. The chemical attack is said to have been launched between 3 and 5 o’clock in the morning in Guta. How is it even possible to collect a dozen different pieces of footage, get more than 200 kids and 300 young people together in one place, give them first aid and interview them on camera, and all that in less than three hours? Is that realistic at all? As someone who works in the news industry, you know how long all of it would take.
The bodies of children and teenagers we see in that footage – who were they? What happened to them? Were they killed for real? And how could that happen ahead of the gas attack? Or, if they were not killed, where did they come from? Where are their parents? How come we don’t see any female bodies among all those supposedly dead children?