Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

United States: Democracy or Judicial Oligarchy
Lawrence journal world ^ | June 24, 2013 | Reasonmclucus

Posted on 06/24/2013 2:23:09 PM PDT by kathsua

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: TwelveOfTwenty

You are incorrect with history and the Founders.

Our ***government*** is not a democracy, it is a republic.

Our ***elections*** are democratic.

Voters vote US representatives, yes this is true. But reps do not make laws, they propose them. The law is made in stages through a republican process with equal and divided powers, and checks and balances. This is fundamental to the United States and is a reason for its success; it is not a democratic process where a majority votes and gets what it wants.


21 posted on 06/24/2013 6:15:07 PM PDT by Hostage (Be Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
You are incorrect with history and the Founders.

Reread my post. I said nothing about history or the Founders. I was commenting on the situation as it is.

Our ***government*** is not a democracy, it is a republic.

In intent or effect?

Our ***elections*** are democratic.

Which according to the dictionary makes our country a democracy.

Voters vote US representatives, yes this is true. But reps do not make laws, they propose them. The law is made in stages through a republican process with equal and divided powers, and checks and balances. This is fundamental to the United States and is a reason for its success;

Yes, but...

it is not a democratic process where a majority votes and gets what it wants.

And who won three of the last four elections? The takers, who voted for the reps that would give them what they want (freebies). Hiding behind words like "republic" and talking about what the Founders intended won't mean anything if we don't start winning Americans over to Conservative values.

22 posted on 06/25/2013 2:58:35 AM PDT by TwelveOfTwenty (Ho, ho, hey, hey, I'm BUYcotting Chick-Fil-A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kathsua; Perdogg; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

23 posted on 06/25/2013 8:16:12 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

There has been little effort to force the Justices to keep to the letter and spirit of the law, allowing some vague shadow or permutation to transform the very meaning of the words in the language of the statute.


What can we do to “force the Justices to keep to the letter and spirit of the law”? I agree something needs to be done. What are our legal options with the federal courts?


24 posted on 06/25/2013 8:31:30 AM PDT by boxlunch (Psalm 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson