Posted on 06/11/2013 3:24:04 PM PDT by Enza Ferreri
"What do we want from modern man?" is the headline on the cover of the Style section of The [London] Sunday Times' latest issue.
The man in the cover photo, almost naked, looks androgynous, as if he hadn't quite made up his mind whether to be male or female (a common occurrence these days).
I'll answer that question by taking a cue from The Sunday Times itself, which for years - at least until I stopped reading it in disgust, no, I mean, because it was too riveting and captivating to bear - has been telling us that man is finished, there is really no role or need for him now that we have artificial insemination and in vitro fertilisation (IVF), and women work or are on benefits.
It is not just this particular paper, of course, to repeat such a mantra, it is in the air, it's the ethos of our time.
The answer I suggest is the following.
Modern men should all become homosexual or at least bisexual, as our friend Peter Tatchell wrote:
Everyone is potentially bisexual...With all (modern) men being at least bisexual, which is the great dream of Tatchell and many of his homosexual activist comrades, we can arrive at this solution.Q: What's the difference between heterosexual and homosexual sex? A: A few inches of flesh...
If homosexual desire is this widespread in a homophobic society, imagine how much more common it would be in a gay-positive culture. With the cultural taboos removed, nearly everyone would savour its delights [give or take a few tuberculosis/AIDS co-infections].
Men will only indulge in the homosexual element of their bisexuality. The semen from these anal or other intercourses, after being tested for HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases and found negative, will then be used for artificial insemination or IVF.
So the human species will continue, but women will be free from the oppression of men, as feminists want, and will have full control over their lives - with the help of the Social Security offices - and reproductive potential, without even the need for Planned Parenthood or similar organizations.
Men will serve as semen donors, and at the same time will enjoy freedom from commitment and, as Tatchell, who can be trusted as an expert on the matter, tastefully put it, "savour its [homosexual desire's] delights ".
Sorted.
To hell with modernity.
Anybody forcing me to adopt that kind of garbage is going to be met with force.
Why test the sperm for HIV? While they’re at it, they’d might as well use it to give AIDS to everyone from birth on up. Then we’ll all be equal.
—And I thought things were about as bad as they could be when Clinton was in the White House.
This has got to be one of the creepiest articles I’ve read in quite a while. It’s like he’s saying that all men are secretly homosexual, and that all women would gladly forgo the pleasures of sex in exchange for a bulb-baster sperm donor, just so they can get that one perfect designer baby. Ew!
It is a satire.
I did not think it would be necessary to explain that this article is satirical.
Reality exists on the far side of Satire these daze.
When humans can modify themselves genetically, outfit themselves with cybernetic equipment, or upload their consciousnesses into computers then it will become meaningless to ask which of these beings is male or female.
Race will be eliminated, sex will be eliminated, sexual orientation will be eliminated. We will all just be sentient beings that interact in various ways with other sentient beings.
Of course it might just be impossible to create the AI beings that the powers that be expect. There may be limits to how much genetic mutation or how many cybernetic replacement parts humans can stand.
But the science community is certain that somehow it will happen someday, so we better get psychologically prepared and get on board the perversity bandwagon!
It’s clear you don’t advocate such, but this is literally what the vanguard fringe of gay groups advocate.
I did not think it would be necessary to explain that this article is satirical.
And then where you put the soul? The creativity, the enginuity, the Enlightenment and the Clear Spirit that makes us Human? There’s a big difference between Humans and Homo sapiens, don’t you know.
It will be interesting if/when someone makes the claim that he has created truly artificially intelligent life. He will go up to an aging scientist and ask him "Do you want to get uploaded into this robot so you can continue doing wonderful scientific experiments forever?"
What if the scientist's friend comes up to him in robotic form and says "C'mon, join the party!" followed by a bunch of stuff that only his friend would say.
Will the scientist say to himself "Sounds great." Or will he ask himself "Is that really my friend in there, or is that robot just really good at the Turing Test?"
I’ll admit it, I didn’t realize that this article was satire. Because I wouldn’t put anything past the moonbats, especially the ones with the radical homosexual agenda.
Which begs the question of why God would create the differences between men and women in the first place?
Homosexualism and feminism are both mental and spiritual disorders.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.