Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Smokeyblue

1. QUALIFICATION IS NEGATIVE AFFIRMATION.

— Meaning that as long as the governing authorities place him on the ballot, the Electoral College cast their votes for him, then the House and Senate certify the election, then he is deemed to have been eligible.

Obama was elected President, he was placed on the ballot by every single Secretary of State. His EC votes cast their vote for him, and the US CONGRESS CERTIFIED THE ELECTION.

HE is in fact President.

2. There is no revoking, no nullifying, no mulligans, no do-overs. Nothing in the U.S Constitution allows for removal of a sitting elected, certified President *LIKE* Obama other than impeachment at the *SOLE DISCRETION* of the U.S Congress.


49 posted on 05/24/2013 10:01:52 AM PDT by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Usagi_yo

Usagi_yo...........would you like Obama to be impeached and removed from office?


50 posted on 05/24/2013 10:08:44 AM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Usagi_yo
1. QUALIFICATION IS NEGATIVE AFFIRMATION.

BULLSH@$

THE QUALIFICATION IS A POSITIVE AFFIRMATION

"SHALL QUALIFY"

Electoral College cast their votes for him, then the House and Senate certify the election, then he is deemed to have been eligible.

They don't have the power to seat a usurper. They become usurpers themselves.

52 posted on 05/24/2013 10:20:40 AM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Usagi_yo
Meaning that as long as the governing authorities place him on the ballot

The best remedy is, and always has been, at the state level.

That is, in Obama's case, all that was ever needed was one state AG to have ordered him removed him from the ballot, which btw, the election authorities in every state have done to candidates since the beginning of the Republic.

They actually NEED NO PROOF per se, the complaint of a citizen or citizens has generally been enough for the proper authorities in every state to at least consider removal of candidates from the ballot, pending either presentation of acceptable bona fides, or a removed candidate bringing a successful suit in state courts for reinstatement.

Alone, the suspicious and murky nature of Obama's documentation would have been quite enough. In point of fact, the election authorities in every state have this power through their state constitutions and it can be quite arbitrary!

In Obama's case, removal from any state's ballot would most likely have resulted in a suit, which would have fast-tracked it to the SCOTUS, no matter which side prevailed in the state courts. Although Obama, like Lincoln, could have chosen to remain off that particular state's ballot, that would have been political suicide.

In short, the solution had always been to force Team Obama to become Plaintiffs rather than Defendants on the state level. If Team Obama were to be the Plaintiffs, there of course could be no issue of standing.

This will be the only way to get a SCOTUS ruling or interpretation of Article II for Rubio, Jindal, Cruz, et al.

I do not mean to minimize the difficulties on the state level, where the stumbling block has been that state courts have generally refused to hear citizens' suits to force their state officials to do their duty. ( i.e., asking for a Writ of Mandamus)

FRiends, the Judge is unfortunately for constitutionalists, correct.

58 posted on 05/24/2013 11:34:13 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk ("Obama" The Movie. Introducing Reggie Love as "Monica." .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Usagi_yo; Smokeyblue
Hmmmm.....

http://www.hark.com/clips/dmkmjcgbdj-we-fixed-the-glitch

Bob#1: Here's a peculiar... Uh, Milton Waddams.
Dom: Who's he?
Bob#2: You know, squirrely looking guy. Mumbles a lot.
Dom: oh, yeah.
Bob#1: We--we can't actually find a record of him being a current employee here.
Bob#2: I looked into it more deeply, and I found that apparently what happened is that he was laid off 5 years ago, and no one ever told him about it, but through some kind of glitch in the payroll department, he still gets a paycheck. So we just went ahead and fixed the glitch.
Lumbergh: Great.
Dom: So, uh, Milton has been let go.
Bob#1: Well, just a second there, professor. We, uh, we fixed the glitch. So he won't be receiving a paycheck anymore. So it'll just work itself out naturally.
Bob#2: We always like to avoid confrontation whenever possible. The problem is solved from your end.

The Bobs, Dom and Bill discuss the peculiar case that is Milton Waddams.

(Office Space)

66 posted on 05/24/2013 3:51:29 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Usagi_yo

Looks like a failure to “Do It Right The First Time”.
Now, what’s next?
Recommend: Plan/Organize/Collaborate/Centrally collect all factual data & evidence/evaluate potential opposition strategies/Evaluate potential success strategies & probabilities/ACT/DO IT RIGHT!!!


69 posted on 05/24/2013 5:29:39 PM PDT by Huskerfan44 (Huskerfan44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson