Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: unlearner

I’m talking about broadcast television. Heck yes, put ‘em all on. All these brainless fools who believe, “oh heck, they’re just like us, only different,” ought to get a good, up close and personal look at the “difference.” Maybe some of their fool attitudes would change.


33 posted on 05/23/2013 2:38:34 PM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: I cannot think of a name

There is a reason why the types of porn I named are illegal to make, distribute, sell, or possess. They involve committing a crime and getting paid for it. Allowing these to be sold would result in more of these crimes being committed.

Putting any pornography on broadcast TV would have the further effect of erroding the nation’s morals and desensitizing people (especially children) to the brutality of it.

Gay porn is easily accessible right now. People choose not to watch it because it has no appeal to them. Using public airwaves to distribute it would legitimitize it, not result in a moral backlash.

If people are not offended enough now by what they are doing, then they simply wont be offended until the homosexuals are beating down their doors demanding for them to send out their guests to be raped.


36 posted on 05/23/2013 2:53:01 PM PDT by unlearner (You will never come to know that which you do not know until you first know that you do not know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson