1. You need to send that to the orignator of the thread, not me.
2. Separate investigators dispute SOME of what is claimed to have been said and some aspects of the reported events.
I always say: Nothing is worse for a good argument than bad evidence. Bad evidence puts itself under deserved scrutiny, which is used by opponents as evidence that the argument itself is wrong. I never use bad evidence if I can help it.
Without meaning to be harsh, someone posting an e-mail without sourcing is usually not interested in actual facts. Most folks just want an echo chamber.