There is no discovery in Supreme Court cases. The issue under consideration is did the original trial court err when it dismissed this lawsuit.
Obama is not a defendant in this appeal. The defendant is the Republican Secretary of State of Alabama. The lawsuit concerns whether Alabama law requires the Secretary of State to check presidential candidates’ eligibility or not. The defense attorney is the Republican Attorney General of Alabama who is arguing that Alabama law does not have any such requirement.
Very good but should the case be remanded back to the trial court the issue of eligibility will go forward and the Arizona
Sheriff’s evidence will be admitted. As discovery ensues this will become the Constitutional crisis that all following this case and other similar cases have anticipated.
The Sheriff’s evidence encompasses not only a fraudulent birth certificate but a participatory fraud by the State Registrar of the Hawaii Department of Health.
“The defense attorney is the Republican Attorney General of Alabama who is arguing that Alabama law does not have any such requirement.”
True but amicus briefs have been filed by several Obot legal teams to PREVENT any hearing that would prove up Joe Arpaio’s evidence of forger, which Zullo claims is now certified as forgery by a forensic digital document laboratory certified to give evidence in federal trials.
This has got to have Fogbloweres, SPs and after-birthers fits from sea to shining sea!
Sad, but accurate. And on a strictly legal basis, there may well be no statutory requirement for the Alabama AG to vet candidates, in particular to ask for a valid BC.
However, Upon verification of complaint, EVERY state removes unqualified, and those accused of being unqualified, candidates from the ballot in many elections. When that happens, the disqualified candidate must either drop out of the race, or bring suit or other legal action against the state to be re-instated.
For example, Rahm Emmanuel was forced to go to court to prove he was eligible to run for Mayor of Chicago when challenged on the residential requirement.
It is important to note that at this point, The Cold Case Posse's findings have nothing to do with Obama...yet. And, the Alabama case at this point, has nothing to do with the forgeries ... yet.
The law, sir? The law is a ass.