Well how absolutely objective and superior of you to exclude even as a possibility that the author of life could not have known what was best for infants and babies, taking them to Himself and stopping them from ending up like their terminally degenerate tribe, and providing husbands and children on the victorious side for women, which executing the rest of the guilty. And seeing as all have sinned, God would be just in executing all.
But here is the paradox. Atheists will blame God for allowing evil men to exist, then condemn Him when He wipes them out, yet He is the author of moral reasoning that judges evil as evil, and preserved the very record of His actions against evil, and the effects it has on all, upon which the atheists engage in their presumptuous elitist moral indignation. Yet under the objectively baseless moral reasoning atheism allows, all sort of evil can be sanctioned as beneficial. As they want to be as God.
Any more distractions? We were talking about the brainwashing of Muslims, originally.
In which you invoked Muslim arguments against the Bible, and then Jewish arguments against Christianity, as you war against both. So why should i not deal with this as with pretense?
So an entity creates a life, then asks another life to destroy it because it foresees the destruction that the former life can bring. Why create that life in the first place, then? A god cannot regret, while yours does. I am not going to delve into this much, here. We discussed this plenty in the other thread.
The original thread speaks about Muslims and my comment was about why they will always be enmical toward Christians and Jews. There can be no peace with Muslims if they (the Muslims) are true to their barbaric faith.