Muzzies know what would happen should they attack a truly conservative city.
I keep hearing that, but I don’t buy it.
Boston is a good scapegoat because it is a northeastern liberal city.
Now, if you said that they attacked Boston because they viewed the politicians and much of the population as competitors for the same ideological space, I could buy that!
The truth is, the article wasn’t about why they attacked Boston specifically, the article was about why they did it at all, geography or target aside.
The author is spot on, and it goes to the heart of liberalism: Nobody is “bad”, it is their environment (poverty, geography, ect) or experiences (racism, perceived persecution, ect) in their lives that “made” them “bad”.
Conservatives understand that a lot of evil is done by evil people, and helped along by weak-minded people who knowingly and unknowingly assist them.
Liberals don’t really believe people ARE evil (unless you are a conservative, Christian, or tea partyer) and they don’t believe people are weak-minded. Liberals believe that is far too “judgmental”, since everyone has the same capability for thought, but some have had their capability for rational thought suppressed because they didn’t go to a Head Start program or were a victim of poverty, racism, (insert something else here, like “conservatism” or “christianity”)
I didn't get more specific:
Useful liberal idiots think that way. Committed liberals DO believe that people are weak-minded, only not themselves and their close associates.