...”people can arrive at their own conclusions as to the credibility of these folks”
Isn’t the goal; in a pursuit of truth, one which determines the credibility of the evidence, rather than merely to discredit a proper authority?
If I understand the process, ‘they’ have the authority and an obligation to investigate the anomalies regarding the internet posted birth certificate.
Should we content ourselves with a peremptorily determination based on speculation, before an argument can be presented in court?
Mr. Tau Food doesn’t have the same opinion. He thinks the situation speaks for itself.
Basically, he doesn’t feel the need to discuss the actual mission of the organization, but to just dismiss it because it is self evident.
What proper authority? Remember, no public money can be used on this case. Truth can be pursued without sending money to anyone who asks.
If I understand the process, ‘they’ have the authority and an obligation to investigate the anomalies regarding the internet posted birth certificate.
No one is obligated to cheat people. if there were a real crime, public funds could properly be devoted to a legitimate investigation of what would be a monstrous crime.
Should we content ourselves with a peremptorily determination based on speculation, before an argument can be presented in court?
There isn't going to be any court unless some prosecutor believes that this birther fundraising scam amounts to a crime.