Also see this part; again a distinction is made between “native born” and “natural born”
:
(7) Restoration of citizenship is prospective . Restoration to citizenship under any one of the three statutes is not regarded as having erased the period of alienage that immediately preceded it.
The words “shall be deemed to be a citizen of the United States to the same extent as though her marriage to said alien had taken place on or after September 22, 1922”, as they appeared in the 1936 and 1940 statutes, are prospective and restore the status of native-born or natural-born citizen (whichever existed prior to the loss) as of the date citizenship was reacquired.
“... is not regarded as having erased the period of alienage that immediately preceded it.”
So once an natural born Citizen is not always a natural born Citizen - correct?
Look up ‘born’ in the dictionary. As an adjective - as it certainly appears to be in the Constitution - the term means ‘from birth’. FROM birth. Not ‘AT birth’.
‘Born’ is not a single point in time status. It is an ongoing status.
Repatriation as a naturalized citizen would nullify natural born status it appears.
Given how stirred up the Fogbowers are this seems to have hit a nerve.