Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Why is a prosecutor having a meltdown doing something so ridiculous as to release a scribbled note like this in his response that he knows will go public???

Why is it being done after he refused to allow a scheduled video deposition of Witness 8, the alleged author of this scribbled note???

Why is this scribbled note not not date-stamped with the date that it was received by the state.

Why does the note look like the handwritten date at the top was added by some other hand after the note was scribbled???

A FWIW Answer:

It's the handwriting that Bernie and his surrogates are trying to enter into the record -- not the contents of the note.

The handwriting in this note is DeeDee2's [the DeeDee that he interviewed on April 2] not DeeDee1's [the DeeDee that Crump interviewed on March 19th].

This is the prosecution's deceitful attempt at defusing the Two DeeDee allegation which is likely to come out in the upcoming continuation of the Witness 8 video deposition. Thus this attempt to derail such speculation and try to bury the Two DeeDee allegation.

When Witness 8/DeeDee2 in her deposition gives a handwriting sample, it will match the handwriting in this supposedly genuine note. And the prosecution will then say: Voila!! See that. The handwriting from the March 19 note matches the handwriting of the person that I interviewed on April 2nd.

This has prosecution complicity with a Scheme Team fraud written all over it.

1 posted on 03/29/2013 7:58:43 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Chip

2 posted on 03/29/2013 8:01:18 AM PDT by Diogenesis (De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Chip

More twists and turns than a Fun House maze!


3 posted on 03/29/2013 8:03:29 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

States Response to Defense Motion for Sanctions against State Attorney’s Office:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/132906836/BDLR-States-Response-to-Ds-Motion-for-Sanctions-Against-State-Attorneys-Office-for-Discovery-Violations-3-28-13


4 posted on 03/29/2013 8:05:30 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Chip
I am amazed at the childish, nasty, contemptuous opening statement by the states attny (http://www.scribd.com/doc/132906836/BDLR-States-Response-to-Ds-Motion-for-Sanctions-Against-State-Attorneys-Office-for-Discovery-Violations-3-28-13)

“The only thing more inflated than Defense Council's rhetoric is perhaps the alleged hourly fees cited in a second motion for payment of attorney's fees and costs.”

Might as well stick your thumbs in your ears, wave your fingers and bleat “nay-nay-nay.”

Just as mature as that opening remark.

States attny should be fired for that remark. Because the states attny is an officer of the court and this "officer" (supposed adult) shined their back-side to the world by demonstrating a level of contempt that would not be tolerated if Defense Counsel did same, the court should act forcefully.

6 posted on 03/29/2013 8:36:46 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Chip

Floridians.... these prosecutors are the buddies and campaign stooges of Gov Rick Scott and AG Pam Bondi. If you do not primary the two out in 2014, you pretty much condone this lynch job on George Zimmerman.

More reason for conservatives to bolt the GOP.....everyone on the govt side working w the Black Racists are all GOP


7 posted on 03/29/2013 8:49:44 AM PDT by SeminoleCounty (GOP = Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Chip

The Dee Dee Letter appears to be completely discrediteed and refuted by the 911 call recordings. Tary vo Martin’s movements described in the 911 call indicate the movements described in the Dee Dee Letter are mpossible to accomplish in the time and space the 911 call and the scene of the homicide established.


8 posted on 03/29/2013 9:04:02 AM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Chip

“Why is a prosecutor having a meltdown...”
From reading his Response, I’d say what we have here is a childish egomaniac, who believes in his power to bully and bamboozle. He bullies and slings mud, but offers nothing to refute the allegations. No doubt Judge Nelson will find it compelling.

The inclusion of “Exhibit B” is curious. I guess BdlR is trying to claim that W8’s “hospital” lies are irrelevant, since she had already penned the basic storyline without it, and this makes his concealment ok. Sort of a sure I stole his wallet, but there wasn’t much in it defense. (hmm... when was this note provided to the Defense — after the Defense depo of W8?).

The note contains interpretations, presented in a tidy flow of talking points. The note and the interview include nothing extraneous to the desired story line. These aren’t the fragmented facts of a witness, from which an investigator could “connect the dots”; they are pre-packaged conclusions, the product of obvious rehearsal and revision. W8 might be the writer; her authorship seems most unlikely. I hope that the Defense managed to keep W8 to facts — who said what and when — not only about the night of the shooting, but all her contacts and discussions with Tracy and Sybrina Fulton, when and how the note came to be written and why, who suggested and “helped” her with it, etc.


12 posted on 03/29/2013 10:44:48 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson