[marktwain]

Those who say the Democrats are in a lose/lose situation mean this: Lose votes, because "gun control" is not popular in spite all the push polls; or lose money from the big donors that run the Democrat machine.

[InterceptPoint]

I also see that the going rate of return for “donations” to the Obama campaign are running around fifty million in taxpayers money for a five hundred thousand donation.

Anybody know what this means?

[cotton1706]

The people: Gun Control and we throw you out!

Let’s see who wins.

[FlingWingFlyer]

It appears as though some DemocRAT public servants are going to have to “evolve” if they want the big bucks to keep rolling in. We’ve got the best government that money can buy.

[Forty-Niner]

BS..... Democrats need not be coerced into supporting “gun control” legislation.” This is a fig leaf for those in purple/red districts/states......

“The devil made me do it!”

[Mamzelle]

My question—why do these rich donors care so much about gun control? How do they make money that way? I don’t buy that their hearts are breaking over Newtown.

[Dutch Boy]

The people had better start demanding that articles of impeachment be created for any elected official that supports gun control.

[GreyFriar]

and to use a gun related phrase in the article about anti-gun donors...tsk, tsk — the phrase: lock, stock, and barrel. The firing lock (on old flintlock guns, now replaced with the hammer and firing pin, the stock of the gun, and the gun’s barrel.

[G Larry]

Colorado is already on a path to evict the Dem’s in 2014.

Oh, and did I mention massive non-compliance in the mean time?

Like the family won’t continue to fire each other’s weapons?!?!?!

[jmaroneps37]

Couldn’t happen to a nicer more deserving bunch. :-)