[MarthaT]

We The People's strategic switch from arguing aka Obama's 'Eligibility' to presenting hard evidence of "Obama's" IDENTITY FRAUD - which of course spells MASS ELECTION FRAUD - has been key. The former issue set us up against accomplished attorneys who used their God-given talent to spin, deceive, out-talk, ridicule, and strong-arm honest patriotic Americans; and to bully and shame Judges into turning their backs on us. Now, however, the issue is criminal fraud. We've got hard evidence of it. He has not one bit of proof that he actually is who he's claimed he is. Hence, his stonewalling access to his records. With "Obama's" willful, repetitive, criminal acts of contempt against The American Electorate, who can reasonably defend that? History will report that "Barack Hussein Obama II" is nothing but a synthetic identity set into motion in approximately 1980 to establish a "person" from his early 20's onward. The presented family-of-origin names and places are entirely bogus.

[WildHighlander57]

Word!!!!!

That’s exactly where its at now!

The forgery/lies/loosey goosey Hawaii system/ has now borne its criminal fruit!

High crimes and mis-demeanors, anyone???!!!????

Book ‘em!!

[Hotlanta Mike]

Yes, absolutely correct. And now whoever stands in the way of allowing for proper inspection of the identity of the unvetted one can potentially be prosecuted as an accomplice to a grand conspiracy. Is the democratic party willing to go to the mat for a criminal? Or will they throw HIM under the bus along with Eric Holder?