Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another solar manufacturer gives up
Watts Up With That ^ | March 7, 2013 | Anthony Watts

Posted on 03/07/2013 7:58:26 PM PST by Rocky

It seems to be a trend now, last October it was Seimens who gave up on solar, now it is British Petroleum, who has been in the solar business nearly 40 years, and has made the last closure announcements, finalizing what they announced in 2011.

In the news today:

(Reuters) – British oil major BP shut down the remnants of its solar unit on Wednesday, drawing a line under the business on which most of its Beyond Petroleum tagline of the early 2000s was premised.

The unit, which BP has been scaling back since 2008, is the latest sun energy business to fall victim to rampant competition from China, falling prices, overcapacity and lower government subsidies on which the industry still depends.

Solar Millennium on Wednesday became the second German solar company to file for insolvency in December, following module maker Solon.

U.S. company Solyndra LLC folded earlier in 2011 while Swiss bank Sarasin said in a recent study that Conergy and Q-Cells were among the German solar companies most exposed to the sector’s crisis.

“The continuing global economic challenges have significantly impacted the solar industry, making it difficult to sustain long term returns for the company, despite our best efforts,” BP said in an internal letter to staff.

The company confirmed on Wednesday that it plans to exit its large-scale projects at Long Haven in the U.S. and Moree in Australia.

BP announced plans in July to abandon its household and industrial rooftop solar activities to concentrate on the larger projects but said on December15 that even those were no longer viable.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: bankruptcy; greenenergy; solar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
“The continuing global economic challenges have significantly impacted the solar industry, making it difficult to sustain long term returns for the company, despite our best efforts,” BP said in an internal letter to staff.

It just isn't economical.

1 posted on 03/07/2013 7:58:29 PM PST by Rocky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rocky

Solar power sucks. It is weak and expensive. I like coal and Gas!I do have a hybrid car and it is awesome and I get 43 mpg!! I love that. But solar is gone. Wind is finished!!Good old fracked oil is wonderful!!


2 posted on 03/07/2013 8:08:02 PM PST by willardwx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky
But solar is the future.

Green energy! Green energy!

3 posted on 03/07/2013 8:08:32 PM PST by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

I would have thought that BP, who has been around quite a while, would know that anything which requires a government subsidy to make it a viable operation would never succeed. If the public wants something, build it and they will buy it with their own money.


4 posted on 03/07/2013 8:10:19 PM PST by Grams A (The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky; willardwx; Jeff Winston; Grams A

BP has moved into ethanol production in a major, major way by purchasing most of the patent portfolio of Verenium Corp. So the “Beyond Petroleum” motto is still accurate.

E85 is a mixture of 85% ethanol, 15% unleaded gasoline. A lot of the late model cars and trucks have an E85-burning engine as an option, and with subsidies the fuel is really cheap. If you can find a gas station that sells E85 in your area, it’s almost certainly a BP station.


5 posted on 03/07/2013 8:18:09 PM PST by Bryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

Zero is really having a baaaaad week, isn’t he.


6 posted on 03/07/2013 8:21:47 PM PST by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: willardwx
Hey, me too. A all electric cars are a joke too. A fad. The only compelling option is a hybrid. Still the ROI may not be there. I do love my hybrid, though.
7 posted on 03/07/2013 8:22:28 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bryan
"E85 is a mixture of 85% ethanol, 15% unleaded gasoline."

I believe you have that bass-ackwards.

8 posted on 03/07/2013 8:27:11 PM PST by SnuffaBolshevik (In a tornado, even turkeys can fly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bryan

A glass is half empty...

The down side: your mileage will drop. And yes it is cheaper but that is because it is heavily subsidized. Ethanol is artificially held low to be able to compete.

And the the impact to the cost of corn and corn related products? A boon for the farmers, though. I imagine that they are doing pretty well.


9 posted on 03/07/2013 8:28:46 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rocky
!I do have a hybrid car and it is awesome and I get 43 mpg!!

I remember reading that the batteries are good for about 8 years and that they cost a bundle to replace. What are your plans?

10 posted on 03/07/2013 8:28:54 PM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SnuffaBolshevik

My apologies.

You are right with the up to 85% ethanol/15% gasoline.

God help us.


11 posted on 03/07/2013 8:31:07 PM PST by SnuffaBolshevik (In a tornado, even turkeys can fly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SnuffaBolshevik

E10 is 10% ethanol. E85% is 85%.

We are forced to buy E10 year round here in Colorado even though it isn’t required. E10 is cheaper? Yes, something that is mixed (ethanol and gasoline) versus something that isn’t (straight gasoline) is cheaper.


12 posted on 03/07/2013 8:34:46 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac
People are still driving the first hybrids after 200K miles with the old batteries.

This was my concern. But apparently it isn't as big an issue as people claimed and claim.

200K miles is pretty good for any car.

On the other hand, will a person ever recover the added expense of the hybrid system in increased gas mileage? Don't know. However, as determined as Obama and the loony left are in driving energy prices through the roof in that respect it is an investment.

13 posted on 03/07/2013 8:45:54 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SnuffaBolshevik
"E85 is a mixture of 85% ethanol, 15% unleaded gasoline."

I believe you have that bass-ackwards. NO thats spot on correct/ earlier ethanol blends only used 10 to 15 percent ehanol. e85 is kicked up to these high levels. The only reason it has gas at all in it is to keep the brightest of the bright from drinking it.I've burnt many hundreds of gallons of this stuff while commutting to work in NE. No loss in poweror increase in engine noises, just a 10% reduction in mileage. can easily be compensated for buy the lower cost

14 posted on 03/07/2013 8:52:44 PM PST by vikzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rocky
Solar actually is one of the most practical of all of the various alternative energy technologies.

It is just very poorly suited for large scale plant applications.

The current generation of rigid silicone based cell are not green nor energy saving because the require several times energy in coal, gas or petroleum based fossil fuels in one day to manufacture than they actually produce over their 20 year(maybe) life

The next generation of solar will be green, energy efficient and practical, assuming the companies developing these technologies survive.

The irony here is that the well intentioned “Green Boom” was based on feel good, limousine liberal environmentalism, not hard science and engineering and the artificial demand generated force fitting of old generation solar systems into application were not suited for may kill off all of the new breakthrough solar technologies and start up companies

Thus the law of unintended consequences may have given rise to a disastrous out come - the big push to jump start the commercialization of solar using obsolete technology may end up destroying the future of the emerging breakthrough solar technologies..

15 posted on 03/07/2013 8:56:51 PM PST by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grams A
Thereason that BP exits all the greeny stuff is that BP predicts that the US will be energy independent and a nett oil exporter by 2030.

Read it here: http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/globalbp_uk_english/reports_and_publications/statistical_energy_review_2011/STAGING/local_assets/pdf/BP_World_Energy_Outlook_booklet_2013.pdf

16 posted on 03/07/2013 9:07:08 PM PST by spokeshave (The only people better off today than 4 years ago are the Prisoners at Guantanamo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn

“The irony here is that the well intentioned “Green Boom” was based on feel good, limousine liberal environmentalism, not hard science and engineering”

As we have seen in a couple of recent incidents, letting the government in the door can destroy the reputation of even a whore house.


17 posted on 03/07/2013 9:37:20 PM PST by haroldeveryman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

Shocked I tell you! Can’t believe that any of these folks are going out of business when they get so much help from the government! What the heck is going on here!


18 posted on 03/07/2013 9:52:42 PM PST by Deagle (quo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

Thanks for the link.


19 posted on 03/08/2013 3:16:08 AM PST by Grams A (The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

I believe your comment/question was intended for post#2 on this thread, not for me.


20 posted on 03/08/2013 4:22:56 AM PST by Rocky (Obama is pure evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson