[mnehring]

It looks like the blog author forgot to put down his equations and controlled experiments that prove his point.

[Pecos]

His "out" is that he says it would take instruments far in advanced of today's technology to be able to prove his point - which means he cannot, or at least has not, been able to prove his point mathematically. The essence of his problem may lie in his own self-contradictory statements, to wit,

"It is not that the act of observation that alters reality. In fact the physical nature of the "observation" small though it may be is sufficient to alter the metrics of sub atomic particles."

If someone can point out the practical difference between a physical act of observation and the fact that an observation has physical impact, I would appreciate it.

[SgtHooper]

No longer a requirement. All that’s needed is a “feeling”.