It's a pro-abstinence warning.
Posted on 02/26/2013 5:03:30 AM PST by scottfactor
All this could be brought to an end by prohibiting T-shirts, jeans, sneakers and shorts and making students wear the equivalent of business casual.
schools are overated and their time has come to roll up and go away.
What would replace them then?
GREAT article....and the take-away:
California is also at the tip of the homosexual spear, having passed state legislation mandating that homosexuality be infused into the public school curriculum and portrayed in a positive light.
There is no opt-out for parents who want to shield their children from this immoral, unnatural and unhealthy indoctrination.
The list includes:
-homosexual-bisexual-transsexual indoctrination without parental consent, including off-campus pro-homosexuality counseling;
-pro-abortion indoctrination,
-“confidential” abortion referrals and off-campus -“counseling” without parental consent,
condom and birth control pills indoctrination and distribution without parental consent,
-“abstinence-only” education prohibited;
-anti-God, pro-evolution indoctrination,
-anti-Christian indoctrination,
-widespread rejection of religious and moral values;
-political correctness,
-dumbed-down academics
anti-parent sentiments.
Public education is ruining our children yet we continue to subject them to it because the schools are “free.” There is no point in expecting enough people to wake up. Our best hope is that the system eventually fails so spectacularly and expensively that it cannot be saved. Then we can pick up the pieces and start over.
so how do we get rid of perversion in the curriculum?
I’m not a big fan of that shirt. IMO it IS offensive and neither of my kids would have been allowed to own and/or wear it.
But is it offensive enough to ask a kid to change it at school? Not really.
Ideally nothing. If your child is hungry, you go buy food. If your child is cold, you go buy him a coat. If your child is uneducated, it follows that you need to provide him an education. By asking the government to educate him instead you virtually beg for him to be ruined.
We start our own schools, or use the private schools that are already there.
While we’re at it, we also need to steer our kids away from popular entertainment (movies, TV and music) that contains the wrong messages, until they’re old enough to handle it without being indoctrinated.
This is the course of action chosen by some conservative communities such as the Amish and the Hasidic Jews. They’re thriving and growing.
Post number 10 also has good ideas also.
Private and faith-based schools do a wonderful job in education.
I agree. Private and religious schools are great. So is homeschooling. So is almost any scheme that doesn’t involve the government. My point is this: whoever pays makes the rules. When you pay, it gets done your way. When the government pays, it gets done their way. There was a time when our government more often than not had our best interests in mind and treated our children accordingly. Those days are long gone.
a lot of the parents have been indoctrinated already
It's a pro-abstinence warning.
Political correctness = Satan’s morality. This was predicted a couple thousand years ago. And actually is an ongoing trend with one society after another descending into the abyss of immorality that precedes the fall.
I know what it is.
Neither of my girls would have been allowed to own/wear it.
Yes, you said that in your first comment.
Just about anything on network television on any given evening that high school kids watch is a thousand times worse than that very tame t-shirt. This example just shows the utter hypocrisy of the public school system. Where it’s fine for a boy to dress in girls’ clothes and for the teachers to teach kids how to put a condom on a cucumber, this girl is not allowed to wear a very mild warning to abstain from sex until marriage. It’s ridiculous.
My girls didn’t watch many TV shows that other kids watched, nor did they watch R movies, listen to songs with suggestive lyrics, or read trashy novels.
Nor did they participate in any type of ‘sex education’ at school.
The shirt is fairly tame, I agree, it’s just that it wouldn’t have lived in my house — maybe yours, which is not my concern.
No, it’s no concern, and it’s not the point. The point of the column is the absurd double-standard of our godless public education system.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.