In the 2012 election, 50% of Catholics voted communist; 48% voted against the communist. That's only a slight improvement from 2008, when 54% of Catholics voted communist.
Even the 30% of White Prot/Other Christian who voted communist makes that grouping a 30% waste of human potential.
You're going to need to find a more reasonable set of labels among which to divide us.
Rubio is a slick talker, but he is NOT a conservative. If so, just what is it he would be conserving? "Conservative" means "conserving" the US Constitution and our constitutionsl republic.
Legalizing 40 Million or 50 Million illegals, and providing them a pathway to citizenship so they can vote communist, is not "conserving" our republic.
Rubio running for president, while not being a Natural Born Citizen, would just be another very large nail in our coffin.
Presidential Vote by Religious Affiliation and Race
Let me narrow this down just a little more to help you.
You're going to need to find a more reasonable set of labels among which to divide us.
100% of conservatives voted against the communist, muslim, homo, Kenyan pissant, hoping to keep the republic alive just a short while longer. However imperfect the opposition candidate was, any real "conservative" would have recognized the disaster of continuing this administration.
Anyone who did not vote for the opposition candidate, voted to NOT conserve the republic, therefore if they are calling themselves "conservative", they are misusing the label.
That is your starting point. Religious flavors are not relevant to the question of "conserving" or "not conserving" the constitutional republic.