Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fact Check—CNN's Blitzer: Sheriffs Can't Defy Executive Orders
Breitbart's Big Journalism ^ | February 1, 2013 | Ken Klukowski

Posted on 02/01/2013 11:53:11 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Discussing gun control, CNN's Wolf Blitzer on Friday told a Utah sheriff that if Barack Obama issues an executive order, that order is the law and the sheriff must obey. However, jurisprudence on this topic reveals exactly the opposite.

As the head of the executive branch of the federal government, a president can issue executive orders only to employees of the federal government—and only regarding implementing federal laws or programs. A governor can likewise issue executive orders to employees of his state government regarding the laws or programs of that state.

Every sheriff is a county officer, elected by the voters of that county...

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: banglist; cnn; gunconfiscation; guncontrol; leo; obama; secondamendment; utah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: momincombatboots

“Doesn’t the exec order become a law in ninety days?”

Nope. An Executive Order carries NO additional legal weight of any kind.

An Executive Order is simply something he writes down, but all of his orders, verbal or written, are Executive Orders. The President can simply verbally state what he wants his staff to do.

Also, he ONLY commands his staff and ONLY within the confines of the law as passed by the Congress.


41 posted on 02/02/2013 9:39:42 AM PST by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Skepolitic
Skepolitic said: "Government officials have a duty to defy an unlawful order."

I think the Nuremberg experience goes even further. Lawful or not, government officials have a duty to defy orders which are inherently evil. Passing a law in Germany to authorize killing of Jews did not in any way justify obedience to such laws.

The movie Judgement at Nuremberg depicts the trials of some of the court judges. They were convicted of having OBEYED unjust laws.

42 posted on 02/02/2013 10:15:36 AM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Media writing the rules again


43 posted on 02/02/2013 10:42:00 AM PST by The Mayor ("If you can't make them see the light, let them feel the heat" — Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
"If you are a federal official of any type...even a forest ranger...than you have to obey Presidential executive orders."

Technically speaking it's more restrictive than that. The President is the head of the executive branch. His orders pertain to the executive branch only i.e. the cabinet departments and their underling agencies, bureaus, etc.

EOs have (or should have) no bearing on Legislators, their staffs, Federal Judges and their clerks, etc.

Granted the overwhelming majority of fedgov employees are in the executive department, and certainly not to private citizens.

44 posted on 02/02/2013 10:49:55 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Cnn’s finest proves just how ignorant and gullible they are no wonder all their reports sound the same.


45 posted on 02/02/2013 10:51:52 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

So the Jap- Amercans who went to camps were... illegal, or a figment of hysterical history.
?


46 posted on 02/04/2013 1:57:11 PM PST by momincombatboots (Back to West by G-d Virginia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

So the Jap- Amercans who went to camps were... illegal, or a figment of hysterical history.
?


47 posted on 02/04/2013 1:57:15 PM PST by momincombatboots (Back to West by G-d Virginia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots

Non-sequitur. The federal government ran the program but in no way forced any Sheriff to comply. Any compliance was voluntary. Try again. This time, try to pick something you actually know something about.


48 posted on 02/04/2013 2:00:08 PM PST by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

A Sheriff is also capable of deputizing and arming large segments of his county population. I, for one, would be happy to serve my county should the need arise.


49 posted on 02/04/2013 3:02:13 PM PST by ez (Laws only apply to little people. Criminals, politicians, and newsies are exempt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson