Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: driftless2

I agree on the Eisenhower part. That’s a silly way to argue against people in general. The flouridation thing is way overblown, though. Mass medication is socialistic, as is state control of the ware supply. Also, there aren’t really any benefits to it, so it’s pointless socialism.

Even if pretending it’s a communist plot, if that’s what they did, is bad politics, I do so hate it when one side steamrolls a debate by painting all opposition as nuts. Sometimes, very seldom, all opposition is nuts. But forced dozing through the water supply is not so common sense as it now seems.

The very fact that we remember the Bircher position on flouridation, seems to me, is evidence that there was an opposition to discredit. Otherwise they wouldn’t have bothered discrediting them.


7 posted on 01/31/2013 3:25:38 AM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Tublecane

“I agree on the Eisenhower part”

Eisenhower was a yes man for FDR, if he hadn’t been screwing FDR’s daughter he wouldn’t ever gotten past lieutenant!!!


72 posted on 02/01/2013 6:53:38 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson