Posted on 01/28/2013 11:33:35 AM PST by ethical
On January 10, 2013 the Washington State Supreme Court fined Linda Jordan almost $13,000 because she legally challenged Barack Obama's use of forged identity documents: A fake birth certificate and phony Social Security Number.
Jordan wanted the original records to be produced for comparison. Why did Jordan want to see Obamas real ID?
The Maricopa County Sheriff Department has presented credible evidence that the birth certificate Barack Obama posted on the White House website on April 27, 2011 was forged. (Maricopa County Sheriff Department 602.876.1801) Jordans own research confirmed that Hawaii law requires signatures on birth certificates to be in permanent ink. The signature of Obamas mother, on his purported 1961 birth certificate, is partly ink and partly a computer created signature. This compilation means the signature was forged. Ohio Private Investigator Susan Daniels has confirmed that the Social Security Number Obama is using was previously issued to someone else. SSNs are NEVER re-issued.
Obama used this fake ID to prove he was eligible to be President. It got him on the ballot and into the White House. This is fraud in the least, treason at worst.
I filed the lawsuit because I fear for Americas future. A serious crime has been committed right in front of us and federal agents turned a blind eye to it. There is substantial evidence that Barack Obama is using fraudulent identity documents. The court ignored this evidence and sanctioned me with almost $13,000 in fines for exercising my right to request an evidentiary hearing. They labeled my concerns "frivolous". Surely Americans have the right to confirm if Obama used fake ID to gain access to the White House. Linda Jordan
http://www.obamaforgeries.com
Let's not get silly here.
No part of the Bill of Rights (which themselves are Amendments) or any part of the original ratified Constitution can be amended by Executive Order.
Thanks for the link to that decision. I would like this prick of a judge to tell me how the Constitution gives the responsibility for Congress to determine eligibility of a President elect in the instance where there are no legally-determined birth facts and HI state law says that the birth record that’s been presented must have its probative (legal evidentiary) value determined when it is presented as evidence to a JUDICIAL OR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICIAL OR BODY. Congress is legislative; there is no way it can lawfully determine the probative value of Obama’s non-valid Hawaii birth certificate. How, then, could Congress resolve this eligibility issue, since he specifically claims that the Constitution does not allow the courts to deal with Presidential eligibility.
(And how the HECK does he get away with blowing off the 20th Amendment, which says that a President elect (who can’t even be a President elect until Congress is all done with what the Constitution allows them to do with Presidential elections) can still fail to qualify before Jan. 20th? Who has the power to act on Presidential qualification once Congress has done their part - if not the courts? Sheesh. This guy is a MORON!)
Furthermore, the Congressional Research Service rightly noted in its advisory opinions to members of Congress that Presidential elections are run by the STATES according to the Constitution. That is the reason that Congress has ducked out of doing anything on this issue for the past 4 years. This judge contradicts the CRS, so maybe he should give his reasons as to why the CRS is just a bunch of internet “flakes”.
Furthermore, this judge should be sued for libel, presuming to say that Jordan filed this lawsuit just to add to the internet “noise”.
Excuse me?
Abuse of power under color of authority is the short version.
Fraud.
Obamacare.
A neverending list of abuses, usurpations and fraudulent taxes and illegal laws(not one cent more in taxes.)
The fact that Congress and state governments fail to challenge something does not make it Constitutional.
Legal and Constitutional are not interchangeable.
Every working, non governmental working American has standing.
I fail to find, in that article, the specific reason for the fine. When a legal matter is brought before a court, and it lacks standing, it is merely rejected. If fines were legal, no legal procedures would ever proceed, given large enough fines.
Justice has a blindfold and scales, but no pockets.
Uh, Michael Corleone is Eyetalian!
I would say fake (even though I believe it’s accurate). The picture is too nice for a quick-shot ID card.
I also believe that things like this are being released by the Administration itself, so that they can be discredited later on.
Geez, talk about silly.
Actually, Cajones does mean something in Spanish. Un cajon is a wooden box, often used as a percussion instrument.
It looks to be as original as obiOne's layered birth certificate.
I went to a much smaller school than Columbia. We had the digital ID with Bar Code by 1981. Not sure when it started.
And also a percussion instrument used in flamenco and in Afro Caribbean music.
If the law she cites gives her standing to file a lawsuit, then how can it be that the judiciary lacks jurisdiction? If the law allows lawsuits it must allow the judiciary to have jurisdiction. Is this judge claiming that the law is unconstitutional because it doesn’t specifically exempt Presidential eligibility lawsuits?
And if that is what he is claiming, then why should Jordan have to pay $13,000 for the state’s passage of an unconstitutional law?
And BTW, how can he rule on a law’s constitutionality if that is not being challenged?
And also a percussion instrument used in flamenco and in Afro Caribbean music.
And also a percussion instrument used in flamenco and in Afro Caribbean music.
And also a percussion instrument used in flamenco and in Afro Caribbean music.
And also a percussion instrument used in flamenco and in Afro Caribbean music.
And also a percussion instrument used in flamenco and in Afro Caribbean music.
Three different kinds of percussion instruments? Wow!
The photo of obozo is too sharp with respects to the other card and its own surroundings.
Fake ,funny but fake.
I still have my Columbia ID from 1982. The one posted on Snopes doesn’t look anything like it.
She has been fined because of the lack of Obama’s bona fides. I would think that would give her standing to pursue the issue in a higher court. The “frivolous” claim made by the judge could be either confirmed or refuted if the evidence is provided by the defense—to date, no credible evidence has.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.