“How is it possible to prove a paper document is forged by examining an electronic copy of it?”
Of course it is not possible, but that is NOT what Arpaio is claiming.
Arpaio is claiming that the White House LFBC pdf could not possibly be the image of an actual paper document, as claimed by the criminals in the HI DOH and state government (thus providing full faith and credit cover for Barry’s BC in federal courts and in all US states).
Arpaio has made no claim as to what is actually in the HI DOH archive although his posse has followed up on suspicions that baby Virginia Sunahara’s BC was used as a template for Barry.
The clear implication of the pdf forgery is that whatever is in the HI DOH DOES NOT look like the pdf. So that begs the question as to it actually does look like and why it is being hidden. On this tape Zullo agrees with Gallups that the implication of the forgery is that Barry is not even a citizen and is thus ineligible, but Arpaio himself has never made this claim...only that there is a forgery and someone did it and his investigation is looking to indict whoever did it. Barry can only be reached legally by rolling over whoever did the forgery and proving they acted as an agent for Barry.
Butterdezillion has gone to great lengths to deduce how HI DOH might be using linguistic evasions and shadings to stay within HI statutes which, to her, implies certain admissions. I personally regard all political appointees in criminal administrations, such as IL and HI, to be capable of giving any kind of false testimony needed or ordered by their handlers (look at all of the IL governors in prison). So I assume nothing to be true unless proved by source documents regardless what any HI official says or “certifies.”
OK, I gotcha. I thought they were claiming the original was a forgery based on their examination of the electronic copy.
I guess we’ll see what they have.