Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain

Well, maybe this is an opportunity to walk back some of the bad ideas that we’ve had shoved down our throats since 1968.

For instance, if all we’re concerned about is “background checks”, why does a 4473 have to go along with every firearm? Change the law — run a potential buyer through NICs, sure, no problem. But why keep a record of the private sale firearm that two private citizens want to sell?


7 posted on 01/21/2013 9:59:34 PM PST by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: absalom01

I could go along with universal checks if the make, model, and serial number of the transferred firearm were not recorded on the form. But they are, so I am opposed.


9 posted on 01/21/2013 10:16:56 PM PST by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: absalom01

I would add a little comment. Since this background check is such a “swell” idea...let’s tie voter registration into this and require a background check each four years on registered voters.

Since it doesn’t infringe upon the American citizen...as we are told...then it won’t hurt on voting checks either.


27 posted on 01/22/2013 1:53:56 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson