Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Now this is a red letter day. In one fell swoop I have both a good feeling about Harry Reid and Obamacare. If someone had asked me if such a thing would ever have occurred, I certainly would have said, 'hell no'.
1 posted on 01/10/2013 7:07:55 AM PST by drbuzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: drbuzzard

Yeah, and like the trick Kennedy used to play to get the dupes to vote for his bills, there’s probably a clause at the end of the bill that eradicates the previous clause.


2 posted on 01/10/2013 7:11:20 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drbuzzard
Oh, isn't that sweet!

Not only will Obama be bared from creating a registration scheme by executive fiat, he is barred by the law HE SIGNED! I'm sure there a more than a few conservative federal judges that will be happy to slap on an injunction and remind him of this little fact if he's dumb enough to try.

3 posted on 01/10/2013 7:13:46 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drbuzzard

When they do shoot, it hits their own foot every time.


4 posted on 01/10/2013 7:15:45 AM PST by bmwcyle (We have gone over the cliff and we are about to hit the bottom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drbuzzard

Right. Like they’ll pay the least bit of attention to “the law”.


5 posted on 01/10/2013 7:16:46 AM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drbuzzard

Unfortunately, when you read the text, what it says is that you cannot use the Obamacare legislation as a justification or controlling authority for a gun or ammunition registry. There are plenty of other vague bits of legislation out there outside of ObamaCare that The One can try to warp to justify his desires.


6 posted on 01/10/2013 7:18:41 AM PST by AzSteven ("War is less costly than servitude, the choice is always between Verdun and Dachau." Jean Dutourd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drbuzzard

I’m sure Der Fuehrer has an executive order ready to fix that portion of the law.


7 posted on 01/10/2013 7:22:13 AM PST by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drbuzzard

He can issue an EO to clarify an existing law. This is a prime example of this. He will merely add that it is only in the context of doctor-patient confidentiality as iut relates to MEDICAL records.


10 posted on 01/10/2013 7:25:24 AM PST by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drbuzzard

There’s a LOT of misinformation about this floating around. The actual verbiage of the law is specific only to the law itself. It prohibits activities under the ACA (i.e. doctor visits) from requesting information or cataloging that information under the guise of the ACA.

If Obama & Co. wanted to pass a registration requirement OUTSIDE of the ACA, they could. Additionally, the ACA states that they cannot ask questions about LEGAL firearm ownership. If they make it illegal to own or possess firearms, Katy bar the door. Any hint of illegal activity can be cataloged and likely will.

Your doctor becomes a deputized law enforcement officer who can report suspicious behavior straight to the brown coats in DC.


11 posted on 01/10/2013 7:28:43 AM PST by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drbuzzard

What’s law to a pig?

This won’t even be a bump in the road for the man of lawlessness. The Dim’s will just ‘change their mind’ and pass a new law revoking the old law.


12 posted on 01/10/2013 7:29:56 AM PST by LucianOfSamasota (Tanstaafl - its not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drbuzzard

THANK YOU, NANCY PELOSI!!!!!!!

Backatcha beeyotch!!!!!!


13 posted on 01/10/2013 7:40:05 AM PST by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drbuzzard
Don't get too comfy. The language in the Affordable Care Act simply bars health insurance entities and doctors from using data collected on gun ownership in any way connected to insurance rates, coverage, etc.

It in no way precludes Obama and his regime of Muslim sympathizers from creating a new database or even confiscating all form 4473s nationwide for use in creating a database that will show them who has what.

The much touted language about firearms in ObamaCare has little to do with the current situation.

14 posted on 01/10/2013 7:41:49 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Humans have eliminated natural selection. Morons are now a protected species. They breed and vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drbuzzard

1) I don’t believe any of this and 2) Obama will issue an executive order doing a) ban on sales and b) ordering registration.

Game, set, match.


17 posted on 01/10/2013 7:57:14 AM PST by Rich21IE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drbuzzard

Okay... Guess we’ll just have to repeal all of Obamacare except for that amendment.


18 posted on 01/10/2013 8:03:59 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drbuzzard

Someone at the NRA saw this coming. Thank goodness for the NRA, and thank stupidity for Harry Ried. Harry got hoodwinked.

But this lawless bunch at the whitey hut don’t follow laws anyway. Don’t see this even slowing them down.


19 posted on 01/10/2013 8:12:45 AM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drbuzzard
The article is deceiving. I believe the amendment prohibits the government from using doctors to gather information on legally-owned guns. It's hardly the silver-bullet [pun intended] it's being touted as.
22 posted on 01/10/2013 9:20:49 AM PST by BfloGuy (Money, like chocolate on a hot oven, was melting in the pockets of the people..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drbuzzard

now we can repass that specific provision as an independent law and even preempt states.


23 posted on 01/10/2013 9:24:57 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drbuzzard

Not a problem for the administration - with Roberts on SCOTUS, it will be determined that recording/removing our weapons is a legitimate tax...


24 posted on 01/10/2013 9:32:10 AM PST by trebb (Allies no longer trust us. Enemies no longer fear us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drbuzzard

Anyone who thinks the Republicans in congress will block changes to this or stand up if any other legislation ignores it- Anybody who believe that is ready for some Grade A swamp land in Florida.


25 posted on 01/10/2013 9:37:26 AM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drbuzzard

bump


28 posted on 01/10/2013 10:21:55 AM PST by saleman (!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drbuzzard

Please let all of your ,or any active military friends and family know that can have a FREE one-year membership to NRA.

NRA offers troops free one-year membership

By Karen Jowers - Staff writer
Posted : Tuesday Aug 14, 2007 17:07:55 EDT

Active-duty military personnel are eligible for a free one-year membership in the National Rifle Association.

A one-year membership typically costs $35. This offer will run indefinitely, said Zach Price, workplace giving coordinator for the NRA Office of Advancement. It is also open to Guard and Reserve members who have been called to active duty.

Service members can sign up for the free year’s membership online.

Benefits of membership include a subscription to an NRA magazine, $5,000 worth of accidental death and dismemberment coverage, and $1,000 of ArmsCare coverage for firearms, air guns, bows and arrows against theft, accidental loss and damage, as well as other benefits.

“NRA wants to emphasize the partnership between itself and the military,” Price said. “There’s a lot of overlap with the military in shooting sports, training classes, and a lot of present NRA members are current or former military.” The NRA’s ties with the military reach back to 1871 when the association was founded by two Union army veterans.

“We want to give a big thank-you to our active-duty troops,” Price said.

As with all similar association memberships, he said, members are asked if they want to renew at the end of their membership, as paid members.

http://nralifeofduty.tv/#/home

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/08/military_nra_070814w/


29 posted on 01/10/2013 10:42:21 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson