Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Repeat Offender
If you wanted serious discourse, surely you could create a more challenging scenario and questions, not something any Poli-Sci 101 student could retort in their beer induced sleep.
50 posted on 01/02/2013 3:49:27 PM PST by varon (If it is to be, then let it start now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: varon
If you wanted serious discourse, surely you could create a more challenging scenario and questions, not something any Poli-Sci 101 student could retort in their beer induced sleep.

Please, by all means enlighten me. The primary argument in every election since GHWB has been the "lesser of two evils." Refute one point that I made in the policies and platforms Myth supports, which hmm seem to be a lot of the same Dem talking points as well.

You can make all the snarky comments you want, but that doesn't change the fact Myth supported abortion, queer "marriage," gun bans, championed RomneyCare in Mass (that 0Care was later based on), and giving Al-Qa'ida in Syria weapons. Nor does it change the fact that Hillary supported the same thing.

If we are going to play the lesser of two evils game, tell me where it ends. Because all I see is the Stupid Party (R) discussing more gun control, caving on the fiscal cliff talks, arguing for arming "rebels" in Syria, arguing for arming "rebels" in Libya (hey didn't one of our Ambassadors get killed in that fiasco?), and saying we need a "bigger tent" to "legalize undocumented immigrants" and welcome "married" homosexuals. None of that sounds like Conservative principle to me.

51 posted on 01/02/2013 3:59:04 PM PST by Repeat Offender (What good are conservative principles if we don't stand by them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson