I did not trust them.
I do not trust you.
Your inability or unwillingness to rationally discuss dissenting viewpoints and your brittleness in the face of criticism are very disturbing.
Your position is very weak. Your estimates of forces on both sides are completely arbitrary and unsupported; it reminds me of Japanese planning for Midway. Your section "what about the military" appears to be based on 'feelings', and completely ignores currency of skills, availability of gear, or segregation of likely dissenters from sure loyalists.
You show absolutely no confidence in the worth of your analysis. If you had such confidence, you would be arguing your point, defending your analysis, further explaining your reasoning.
Instead, you are attacking me personally.
I'd suggest very strongly that if you want to contribute something worthwhile to the cause of freedom, you should check your attitude, learn how to discuss matters rationally, and quit alienating allies.
Your move, son.
Day-ummmm!!
nice one!
People like that make me nuts too- but man, you said it! I WILKL be using that in the future
PM on it’s way.
Nothing was arbitrary or based on feelings, it was all referenced to historical events as well as numbers.
Perhaps what I need to be asking you is how many times throught history, the "rules of logic" have won battles for freedom ? Stopped Democide ? How many lawyers overtook machine gun nests at Normandy Beach with superior debating skills ?
Let us also not forget, that our God is still God. The God who had his pick of all the Lawyers in the land, yet chose little David to slay Goliath.